2003
DOI: 10.1002/aic.690490815
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predicting adsorption of water/organic mixtures using molecular simulation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
19
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
1
19
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This result shows that it is necessary to take into account the surface chemistry of the porous carbon in order to simulate in a realistic fashion the coadsorption of CO 2 and CH 4 . This conclusion is consistent with previous works (Jorge and Seaton 2003;Nicholson and Gubbins 1996). Jorge and Seaton studied the adsorption of hydrocarbon-water mixtures on an activated carbon modeled by an assembly of slit-pores containing carboxyl groups.…”
Section: Effect Of Surface Chemistry On Co 2 /Methane Coadsorption Ansupporting
confidence: 93%
“…This result shows that it is necessary to take into account the surface chemistry of the porous carbon in order to simulate in a realistic fashion the coadsorption of CO 2 and CH 4 . This conclusion is consistent with previous works (Jorge and Seaton 2003;Nicholson and Gubbins 1996). Jorge and Seaton studied the adsorption of hydrocarbon-water mixtures on an activated carbon modeled by an assembly of slit-pores containing carboxyl groups.…”
Section: Effect Of Surface Chemistry On Co 2 /Methane Coadsorption Ansupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Molecular simulation has been used as an adsorption prediction tool in nanoporous materials for decades, both in crystalline frameworks, such as zeolites [15], and in more disordered solids, like activated carbons [16] or mesoporous silica [17], and has more recently been applied to MOFs with some success [18]. However, as highlighted recently [19], the extension of conventional simulation methods and molecular models to MOFs is not always straightforward, and sometimes results in dramatic failures.…”
Section: -Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is the approach described by Jorge and Seaton [28] who represent all such 'active sites' in terms of C=O surface groups, and use grand canonical MC simulation to determine the adsorption kernel, v(H,P), (see equation 1) of water and ethane in slit pores with distributions of these sites. They then use the pure isotherms of water and ethane to characterise BPL active carbon in terms of a PSD and a distribution of active surface sites.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 46%