2011
DOI: 10.1257/aer.101.3.288
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predicting and Preventing Shootings among At-Risk Youth

Abstract: Each year, more than 250 students in the Chicago Public Schools (CPS) are shot. The authors of this paper worked with the leadership of CPS to build a predictive model of shootings that helped determine which students would be included in a highly targeted and resource intensive mentorship program. This paper describes our predictive model and offers a preliminary evaluation of the mentoring intervention performed by Youth Advocate Programs, Inc. (YAP). We find little evidence that the intervention reduces sch… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
51
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
3
51
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Unruly individuals were 16 percentage points more likely to be dead at the end of the two-year period. This result is similar to that obtained by Chandler et al (2011). The authors analyzed data from…”
Section: Mortality After Two Yearssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Unruly individuals were 16 percentage points more likely to be dead at the end of the two-year period. This result is similar to that obtained by Chandler et al (2011). The authors analyzed data from…”
Section: Mortality After Two Yearssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Chalfin et al (2016) provide some preliminary evidence of how machine learning may improve predictive accuracy in these and other personnel decisions. Chandler, Levitt, and List (2011) predict highest-risk youth so that mentoring interventions can be appropriately targeted. Abelson, Varshney, and Sun (2014), McBride and Nichols (2016), and Engstrom, Hersh, and Newhouse (2016) use machine learning to improve poverty targeting relative to existing poverty scorecards.…”
Section: Prediction In Policymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other illustrative examples include: (i) in education, predicting which teacher will have the greatest value add (Rockoff et al, 2011); (ii) in labor market policy, predicting unemployment spell length to help workers decide on savings rates and job search strategies; (iii) in regulation, targeting health inspections (Kang et al 2013); (iv) in social policy, predicting highest risk youth for targeting interventions (Chandler et al, 2011); and (v) in the finance sector, lenders identifying the underlying creditworthiness of potential borrowers.…”
Section: Prediction Problems Are Common and Importantmentioning
confidence: 99%