2022
DOI: 10.1002/adts.202200311
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predicting and Rationalizing the Soret Coefficient of Binary Lennard‐Jones Mixtures in the Liquid State

Abstract: The thermodiffusion behavior of binary Lennard‐Jones mixtures in the liquid state is investigated by combining the individual strengths of non‐equilibrium molecular dynamics (NEMD) and equilibrium molecular dynamics (EMD) simulations. On the one hand, boundary‐driven NEMD simulations are useful to quickly predict Soret coefficients because they are easy to set up and straightforward to analyze. However, careful interpolation is required because the mean temperature in the measurement region does not exactly re… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
15
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 92 publications
3
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The negligible role of pressure is also supported by two features observed during the NVE run: i) no significant increase of the average temperature of the system, indicating a negligible conversion of (initial) mechanical to thermal energy, ii) direct inspection of the time evolution of average concentration differences reveal, in all the cases of study, a clear exponential decay. The robustness of the method is confirmed by the benchmark calculations we performed using as reference two different equimolar LJ mixtures, reported in Table 2, previously investigated by Zimmermann et al [14] and Bonella et al [8] In order to perform benchmark calculations, we adopted the same simulation parameters stated in the two studies, as well as matching, in the case of ref. [8] also the timestep and the LJ cutoff radius, which were set to 0.005 and 3.21, respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The negligible role of pressure is also supported by two features observed during the NVE run: i) no significant increase of the average temperature of the system, indicating a negligible conversion of (initial) mechanical to thermal energy, ii) direct inspection of the time evolution of average concentration differences reveal, in all the cases of study, a clear exponential decay. The robustness of the method is confirmed by the benchmark calculations we performed using as reference two different equimolar LJ mixtures, reported in Table 2, previously investigated by Zimmermann et al [14] and Bonella et al [8] In order to perform benchmark calculations, we adopted the same simulation parameters stated in the two studies, as well as matching, in the case of ref. [8] also the timestep and the LJ cutoff radius, which were set to 0.005 and 3.21, respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…is introduced, the constraint w 1 = 1 − w 2 must hold. Therefore, as also reported by Zimmermann, [14] the state of affairs expressed in Equation ( 6) is completely summarized by focusing on the study of just ⃗ J q,1 and ⃗ J m,1 while the dependence from chemical potential can be re-expressed in terms of the concentration of mass fraction, obtaining…”
Section: The Phenomenological Picturementioning
confidence: 86%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…To provide a complete view of the thermal diffusion effect, more MD simulations of a wider range of n -alkane binary mixtures under different pressure and temperature conditions need to be performed. Second, different MD simulation procedures and settings were observed in various studies. ,, For a specific case (for example, a n C 5 – n C 10 binary mixture), the MD simulation results obtained by different researchers show large deviations due to the differences in MD settings. Our investigations show that the temperature gradient, size of the simulation box, number of molecules, and simulation procedures have a significant effect on the thermal diffusion factor or Soret coefficient.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%