2012
DOI: 10.1080/1331677x.2012.11517497
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predicting Bankruptcy with Semi-Parametric Single-Index Model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The most commonly used are: (1) LR (Jakubík & Teplý, 2008); (2) discriminant analysis (Stroe & Bărbuţă-Mişu, 2010;Zenzerović, 2009); and (3) neural network (Ecer, 2013), etc. The reasons for the wide use of LR models according to Masten and Masten (2012) are: (1) is relatively easy to understand; (2) available in most software packages; and (3) fairly robust (strong, powerful) and reliable tool for predicting the financial problems of the company. Ebrahimi and Nikbakht (2011) showed that their LR model developed on a sample of companies listed on the stock exchange in Tehran for the period between 2001 and 2009 is more superior in predicting the bankruptcy of the company than Altman's (1968) model, Ohlson's (1980) model, Zmijewski's (1984 model and Shumway's (2001) model.…”
Section: Research Methodology and Hypothesismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The most commonly used are: (1) LR (Jakubík & Teplý, 2008); (2) discriminant analysis (Stroe & Bărbuţă-Mişu, 2010;Zenzerović, 2009); and (3) neural network (Ecer, 2013), etc. The reasons for the wide use of LR models according to Masten and Masten (2012) are: (1) is relatively easy to understand; (2) available in most software packages; and (3) fairly robust (strong, powerful) and reliable tool for predicting the financial problems of the company. Ebrahimi and Nikbakht (2011) showed that their LR model developed on a sample of companies listed on the stock exchange in Tehran for the period between 2001 and 2009 is more superior in predicting the bankruptcy of the company than Altman's (1968) model, Ohlson's (1980) model, Zmijewski's (1984 model and Shumway's (2001) model.…”
Section: Research Methodology and Hypothesismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Solvent companies are, therefore, companies in which bankruptcy proceedings did not start within one year. Due to the fact that a large discrepancy between the two groups of companies (Masten & Masten, 2012) may result in a higher probability of correct classification of a group, in this study a sample of insolvent companies that was randomly selected has been expanded with an equal number of solvent companies. The appropriate pattern for the development of models of the 86 cases, therefore, include the financial statements for the period between 2010 and 2011 for two groups of companies in the Republic of Serbia: the first group consists of 43 insolvent companies (companies which were not subject to bankruptcy proceedings during one year) while the second group consists of 43 solvent companies.…”
Section: Sample Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These are: the size of the company; a measure(s) of the financial structure; a measure(s) of performance; and a measure(s) of current liquidity. In connection with the logit model, it is interesting to point to the research conducted by Masten and Masten (2012). They compare the logit model, as a standard parametric model for predicting bankruptcy, with semi-parametric model.…”
Section: Theoretical Framework Of the Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%