2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2021.119778
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predicting bark thickness with one- and two-stage regression models for three hardwood species in the southeastern US

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The variation in the profiles of heartwood, sapwood, and bark along the stem was analyzed to select predictor variables and model forms. The results (Figure 3) suggested that the heartwood radius and bark thickness decreased from base to top for the trees of Korean larch among various ages and sites, which agreed with the results of studies for other species [15,[34][35][36]. In contrast to previous findings [2,4,9,37], sapwood width was higher at the tree base, increased above the tree base to the maximum at the living branch height, and then decreased with tree height.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The variation in the profiles of heartwood, sapwood, and bark along the stem was analyzed to select predictor variables and model forms. The results (Figure 3) suggested that the heartwood radius and bark thickness decreased from base to top for the trees of Korean larch among various ages and sites, which agreed with the results of studies for other species [15,[34][35][36]. In contrast to previous findings [2,4,9,37], sapwood width was higher at the tree base, increased above the tree base to the maximum at the living branch height, and then decreased with tree height.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Predictor variables such as diameter over bark, heartwood radius at breast height, and sapwood width at breast height [8,19] did not consider destructive samples. In addition, many different forms are available as alternatives for bark thickness models, such as the quadratic regression equation, polynomial regression equation [38], segmented polynomial regression equation [39], variable exponent equation [40], and a combination of the stem taper function and bark thickness model by Yang and Radtke [15]. Relative height was the main predictor in these models, as in our study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 52%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…New research shows that a combination of stem taper function and bark thickness model (called the two-stage method) is suggested to predict DBT, especially in upper and lower portions of the tree stem. [ 27 ]. The ANN recursive model also estimated DBT much better than the non-linear function in the ranges up to 1 m high at the trunk and also 1–2 meters from the top of the tree.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%