2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2022.111020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predicting biological joint moment during multiple ambulation tasks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
23
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
4
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Machine learning methods to capture dynamics have been used across physics, engineering, and neuroscience to learn the dynamics underlying complex systems when the governing equations are unknown (Bongard and Lipson, 2007; Pandarinath et al, 2018; Sanchez-Gonzalez et al, 2020). Recently, machine learning models have been used in human gait to predict continuous kinetic variables such as ground-reaction forces (Alcantara et al, 2022) or joint torque (Camargo et al, 2022; Giarmatzis et al, 2020) based on kinematic data. Dynamical machine learning models have also been used to encode gait dynamics, including responses to perturbations or assistive devices, but their model structure did not enable comparisons between individuals (Berrueta et al, 2019; Drnach et al, 2019; Maus et al, 2015; Rosenberg et al, 2020; Wang and Srinivasan, 2013).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Machine learning methods to capture dynamics have been used across physics, engineering, and neuroscience to learn the dynamics underlying complex systems when the governing equations are unknown (Bongard and Lipson, 2007; Pandarinath et al, 2018; Sanchez-Gonzalez et al, 2020). Recently, machine learning models have been used in human gait to predict continuous kinetic variables such as ground-reaction forces (Alcantara et al, 2022) or joint torque (Camargo et al, 2022; Giarmatzis et al, 2020) based on kinematic data. Dynamical machine learning models have also been used to encode gait dynamics, including responses to perturbations or assistive devices, but their model structure did not enable comparisons between individuals (Berrueta et al, 2019; Drnach et al, 2019; Maus et al, 2015; Rosenberg et al, 2020; Wang and Srinivasan, 2013).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This study showed MLP has better performance in joint moment prediction compared with other models and LSTM would be considered for realtime estimation. More recently, Camargo et al [35] estimated hip, knee, and ankle joint moments in multiple locomotion modes (treadmill, stair, ramp) using extracted features from the cluster of electrogoniometer, EMG, and IMU sensors' data, performed feature selection, and then used the selected feature as input into the Artificial Neural Network (ANN) and XGBoost. However, the total number of 18 sensors and the training set that established from a single subject make doubt on practicality in real-world deployment and reproducibilty with unseen human subjects.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, researchers are focusing on acquiring kinetics parameters through data-driven method [34]- [43], [43]- [46]. However, these studies are still relying on a large number of sensors [35], reversely acquired simulated IMU data from the retrospective motion capture data [34], [37], and highly repetitive treadmill/level-ground walking [36]- [43], [43]- [46]. Since experimentally collected IMU data contains noise induced from multi-frequncy vibration during the impact of the limb on the ground, the simulated IMU data that was acquired from retrospectively captured motion capture data may not provide a reliable kinetics estimation during real application.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More recently, studies have successfully used more advanced neural network classes such as recurrent neural networks (RNNs) [19] and attention-based long short-term memory networks (LSTMs) [20], [21] to generate reference trajectories for prosthesis controllers based on able-bodied data. Others have used wearable sensors and machine learning models to predict joint moments for exoskeleton control, also using ablebodied data [22]. However, deep learning models have not been used to predict prosthesis joint dynamics directly for individuals with transtibial amputation.…”
Section: B Current Data-driven Approaches In Prosthetic Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%