2003
DOI: 10.1002/chin.200351219
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predicting Biotransformation Potential from Molecular Structure.

Abstract: Computers in chemistryComputers in chemistry V 0380 Predicting Biotransformation Potential from Molecular Structure. -(BORODINA*, Y.; SADYM, A.; FILIMONOV, D.; BLINOVA, V.; DMITRIEV, A.; POROIKOV, V.; J. Chem. Inf.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Angele, Moench, Oppermann, Staab, and Wenke [29] developed an ontology in which a reaction was described with respect to its participants (instances of a molecule class) and exist as part of a mixture. Borodina, Sadym, Filimonov, Blinova, Dmitriev, and Poroikov [30] suggested a representation for biomolecular transformation as a tuple of (X, reaction), with optional description of the enzyme. Hsu, Krishnamurthy, Rao, Zhao, Jagannathan, Caruthers, and Venkatasubramanian [22] modeled a reaction to have reactants, products and catalysts.…”
Section: Reaction Ontologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Angele, Moench, Oppermann, Staab, and Wenke [29] developed an ontology in which a reaction was described with respect to its participants (instances of a molecule class) and exist as part of a mixture. Borodina, Sadym, Filimonov, Blinova, Dmitriev, and Poroikov [30] suggested a representation for biomolecular transformation as a tuple of (X, reaction), with optional description of the enzyme. Hsu, Krishnamurthy, Rao, Zhao, Jagannathan, Caruthers, and Venkatasubramanian [22] modeled a reaction to have reactants, products and catalysts.…”
Section: Reaction Ontologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For this purpose we used computer program 'PASS' (Sergeiko et al 2008;Filimonov and Poroikov 2005;Borodina et al 2003;Stepanchikova et al 2003), which predicts about 2,500 pharmacological effects, mechanisms of action, mutagenicity, carcinogenicity, teratogenicity and embryotoxicity on the basis of structural formulae of compounds. PASS predictions are based on SAR (structure-activity relationships) analysis of the training set consisting of about 60,000 drugs, drug-candidates and lead compounds.…”
Section: Sar Activities Of Metabolites Isolated From Plant Speciesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are several empirical methods for ranking the most likely pathway for metabolism. PASS-BioTransfo gives the likelihood of a particular class of reactions occurring [34]; SPORCalc [35] and MetaPrint 2D (http://www-metaprint2d.ch.cam.ac.uk/; accessed May 2017) ranks the most likely sites for metabolism in a molecule; TIMES (http://oasis-lmc.org/products/software/times.aspx; accessed May 2017) and Metadrug (https://lsresearch.thomsonreuters.com/pages/solutions/18/metadrug; accessed May 2017) give a probability for formation of a given metabolite; SyGMa (Systematic Generation of potential Metabolites) ranks predicted metabolites according to an empirically derived probability score [36]. Meteor Nexus (metabolite predictor software from Lhasa Ltd; https://www.lhasalimited.org/products/meteor-nexus.htm;…”
Section: The Likelihood Of a Given Reaction Occurringmentioning
confidence: 99%