2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.geodrs.2020.e00333
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predicting carbon and nitrogen by visible near-infrared (Vis-NIR) and mid-infrared (MIR) spectroscopy in soils of Northeast Brazil

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
8
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 69 publications
4
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Apart from the difference in costs of the used instruments and the level of portability, there was no obvious benefit of vis-NIR system over mid-IR, or vice versa. The stated error estimates reported in this study and in earlier studies ( Table 1 ) [ 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 39 , 40 ] are higher than those corresponding to traditional analysis, where the laboratory method has a detection limit of 20 g kg −1 for sand and clay (dry basis), and generally, is reproducible to within ±80 g kg −1 , Ref. [ 49 ].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 66%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Apart from the difference in costs of the used instruments and the level of portability, there was no obvious benefit of vis-NIR system over mid-IR, or vice versa. The stated error estimates reported in this study and in earlier studies ( Table 1 ) [ 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 39 , 40 ] are higher than those corresponding to traditional analysis, where the laboratory method has a detection limit of 20 g kg −1 for sand and clay (dry basis), and generally, is reproducible to within ±80 g kg −1 , Ref. [ 49 ].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 66%
“…These portable instruments are built using semiconductor technologies and they are relatively inexpensive, robust, and simpler to use when compared to laboratory-based bench-top instruments. They are suitable for deployment in the field for proximal sensing [ 1 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 ]. Numerous studies support their use for the simultaneous assessment of primary and secondary soil properties on the go [ 34 , 35 , 36 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the capacity of mineral and organic signature detection, the application of MIR is preferentially centered on clay mineral and humic and fulvic acid studies [21]. However, MIR is increasingly being introduced in similar research where NIR has been used or is even used simultaneously [22,23]. However, there is no research focused on paleoenvironmental reconstruction based on organic matter that uses this spectral range.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Xu, Zhao, et al (2019) found that the models trained with MIR were more accurate for predicting soil fertility attributes (e.g., soil organic matter, total nitrogen and available phosphorus) than the VNIR models. Santos et al (2020) obtained better soil organic carbon and nitrogen concentration predictions using the MIR region than the VNIR region. The absorption features of common organic molecules such as amines, carboxylic acids, aromatic compounds, aliphatic hydrocarbons, amides and some phosphorus and sulphur compounds are better in the MIR region (McDowell et al, 2012), which may explain why the MIR models outperform the VNIR models in assessment of organic‐related properties.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%