Predicting clinical end points: treatment nomograms in prostate cancer

Blasio, Christopher J. Di; Rhee, Audrey; Cho, Daniel; Scardino, Peter T.; Kattan, Michael W.

doi:10.1016/s0093-7754(03)00351-8

Cited by 33 publications

(13 citation statements)

References 101 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…13 during this process, a random bootstrap sample of the original data was generated from the cohort and the model was applied to this sample to yield predicted results. 15 This technique was repeated 1000 times to obtain a bias-corrected estimate of the model's predictive accuracy. discrimination of the model was quantified by using the concordance index (ie, the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Predicting Discharge to a Long-Term Acute Care Hospital After Admission to an Intensive Care Unit

Szubski¹,

Tellez²,

Klika³

et al. 2014

American Journal of Critical Care

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Predicting Discharge to a Long-Term Acute Care Hospital After Admission to an Intensive Care Unit

Szubski¹,

Tellez²,

Klika³

et al. 2014

American Journal of Critical Care

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Care based on evidence-based clinical practice guidelines has been recognized by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) and the Institute of Medicine (IOM) as a key component in improving the quality, safety, efficiency, and effectiveness of health care, 1,12 and has been shown to positively impact clinical practice and patient outcomes across a wide variety of specialties. 8,[13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22] ASPAN is committed to the promotion of the welfare, health, well-being, and safety of patients, and recognizes evidence-based practice (EBP) as the critical link to improving nursing practice and patient outcomes. To this end, ASPAN convened an EBP Strategic Work Team in June 2004 to develop an organizational model for the development, dissemination, and translation of evidencebased clinical practice guidelines for all perianesthesia practice settings.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

ASPAN's Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guideline for the Promotion of Perioperative Normothermia

Hooper¹,

Chard²,

Clifford³

et al. 2009

Journal of PeriAnesthesia Nursing

102

133

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…In current practice, many clinicians rely on various tables or algorithms, such as Partin tables and Kattan nomograms, in order to predict pathological stage and outcomes and to guide treatment strategies in prostate cancer [5,26]. However, when assessing tumor grades, the comments and notes from pathological reports are often not included in prognostic models.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Impact of tertiary Gleason pattern 5 on prostate cancer aggressiveness: Lessons from a contemporary single institution radical prostatectomy series.

Koloff

Hamstra

Wei

et al. 2014

JCO

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective: To better evaluate tertiary Gleason pattern reporting and to evaluate the impact of tertiary Gleason pattern 5 (TP5) on prostate cancer pathological features and biochemical recurrence at our large single institution. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 1962 patients who underwent radical prostatectomy (RP) for prostate cancer; TP5 was reported in 159 cases (8.1%). Men with Gleason score (GS) 7 and GS 8 disease were divided into subgroups with and without TP5, and histopathological features were compared. Multivariate analyses were conducted to assess the impact on TP5 on biochemical-free survival (BFS). Results: Tumors possessing GS 3 þ 4 with TP5 were more likely to exhibit extraprostatic extension (EPE) and had a larger tumor diameter (TD) than GS 3 þ 4 alone. GS 3 þ 4 with TP5 was also associated with positive surgical margins (SM), seminal vesicle involvement (SVI), and higher pre-operative prostate-specific antigen (PSA) values, but without statistical significance. GS 4 þ 3 with TP5 more commonly presented with EPE, positive SM, SVI, and greater TD and pre-operative PSA level than GS 4 þ 3 alone. In multivariate analysis, Gleason score, H O S T E D BYAvailable online at www.sciencedirect.com ScienceDirect journal homepage: www.e lsevie r. com/l ocate /ajur Asian Journal of Urology (2015) 2, 53e58 EPE, and TP5 were overall independent risk factors for PSA recurrence in this cohort. Additionally, GS 4 þ 3 with TP5 was associated with shorter time to recurrence versus GS 4 þ 3 alone.

show abstract

Predicting clinical end points: treatment nomograms in prostate cancer

Cited by 33 publications

References 101 publications

Predicting Discharge to a Long-Term Acute Care Hospital After Admission to an Intensive Care Unit

Predicting Discharge to a Long-Term Acute Care Hospital After Admission to an Intensive Care Unit

ASPAN's Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guideline for the Promotion of Perioperative Normothermia

Impact of tertiary Gleason pattern 5 on prostate cancer aggressiveness: Lessons from a contemporary single institution radical prostatectomy series.

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About