2020
DOI: 10.3390/ma13204501
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predicting Composite Component Behavior Using Element Level Crashworthiness Tests, Finite Element Analysis and Automated Parametric Identification

Abstract: Fibre reinforced plastics have tailorable and superior mechanical characteristics compared to metals and can be used to construct relevant components such as primary crash structures for automobiles. However, the absence of standardized methodologies to predict component level damage has led to their underutilization as compared to their metallic counterparts, which are used extensively to manufacture primary crash structures. This paper presents a methodology that uses crashworthiness results from in-plane im… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A modeling strategy embedding shell layers stacked with cohesive elements was first introduced in [14], where it is demonstrated to be capable of predicting the initiation and propagation of composite failure with an accuracy close to that of a solid elements model. In crash applications, cohesive elements were combined with solid [11,15] or shell [16] elements to model the response of large structures. The model presented in [15] combines cohesive with state-of-the-art techniques (e.g., fiber-oriented mesh, non-linear shear response, and tie-break controlled intra-laminar failure) to model the crash of a ±45 tube with remarkable accuracy but requires 94 h to reach 4 ms. Ref.…”
Section: Composite Materials For Crash Structuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A modeling strategy embedding shell layers stacked with cohesive elements was first introduced in [14], where it is demonstrated to be capable of predicting the initiation and propagation of composite failure with an accuracy close to that of a solid elements model. In crash applications, cohesive elements were combined with solid [11,15] or shell [16] elements to model the response of large structures. The model presented in [15] combines cohesive with state-of-the-art techniques (e.g., fiber-oriented mesh, non-linear shear response, and tie-break controlled intra-laminar failure) to model the crash of a ±45 tube with remarkable accuracy but requires 94 h to reach 4 ms. Ref.…”
Section: Composite Materials For Crash Structuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ref. [16] adopted this strategy for modeling the crash of an IA, demonstrating its accuracy in the prediction of combined fragmentation and delamination of the structure. In this paper, shell and solid cohesive elements are combined to model the out-of-plane strength of the laminate.…”
Section: Composite Materials For Crash Structuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To create the FE model and appropriate element the mesh quality cannot be achieved directly. Therefore, a 3D CAD model was generated, and through the HYPERMESH software, the FE model was generated [34]. To reduce the computational time and simplification of the model a quarter of the model was generated.…”
Section: Finite Element Model and Simulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Table 2 reports material information about the used carbon-fiber-reinforced epoxy material, properties of which were obtained from characterization tests undertaken according to ASTM standards D3039 (tensile), D0790 (flexural), D3518 (shear), and D3410 (compression). The energy failure value and compressive and shear residual stresses were obtained by the use of an optimization technique developed by Garg et al [26]. The energy failure value is the W p described in Equation ( 1) and is one of the failure criteria available as part of the CRASURV model that retains the integrity of the element until the element absorbs energy equal to the failure value, after which softening takes place until the compressive and shear residual stress values shown in Table 2.…”
Section: Design Using Feamentioning
confidence: 99%