Predicting COVID-19 future trends for different European countries using Pearson correlation

Abstract

The ability to accurately forecast the number of COVID-19 cases and future case trends would certainly assist governments and various organisations in strategising and preparing for the newly infected cases well in advance. Many predictions have failed to foresee future COVID-19 cases due to the lack of reliable data; however, such data are now widely available for predicting future trends in COVID-19 after more than one and a half years of the pandemic. Also, various countries are closely monitoring other countries that are experiencing a surge in COVID-19 cases in the expectation of similar scenarios, but this does not always produce correct results, as no research has identified specific correlations between different countries in terms of COVID-19 cases. During the past 18 months, many nations have watched countries whose COVID-19 cases have risen sharply, in anticipation of handling the situation themselves. However, this did not provide accurate results, as no research was conducted that compared countries to determine if their COVID-19 case trends were correlated. As official data on COVID-19 cases has become increasingly available, using the Pearson correlation technique to pinpoint the countries that should be closely monitored will help governments plan and prepare for the number of infections that are expected in the future at an early stage. In this study, a simple and real-time prediction of COVID-19 cases incorporating existing variables of coronavirus variants was used to explore the correlation among different European countries in terms of the number of COVID-19 cases officially recorded on a daily basis. Data from selected countries over the past 76 weeks were analysed using a Pearson correlation technique to determine if there were correlations between case trends and geographical position. The correlation coefficient ( r ) was employed for identifying whether the different countries in Europe were interrelated, with r > 0.85 indicating they were very strongly correlated, 0.85 > r > 0.8 indicating that they were strongly correlated, 0.8 > r > 0.7 indicating that they were moderately correlated, and r < 0.7 indicating that the examined countries were either weakly correlated or that a correlation did not exist. The results showed that although some neighbouring countries are strongly correlated, other countries that are not geographically close are also correlated. In addition, some countries on opposite sides of Europe (Belgium and Armenia) are also correlated. Other countries (France, Iceland, Israel, Kosovo, San Marino, Spain, Sweden and Turkey) were either weakly correlated or had no relationship at all.

Danggui Buxue decoction alleviates cyclophosphamide-induced myelosuppression by regulating β-hydroxybutyric acid metabolism and suppressing oxidative stress

“…Pearson correlation is used to assess a possible association between two continuous variables (Muhaidat et al. 2022 ). In this study, Pearson correlations indicated that the pharmacodynamic effects of DBD could correlate with the biological function of β-OHB by inhibiting HDAC1 activity and resisting oxidative stress.…”

The Impact of Pandemic and Energy Crisis on the Financial Performance of Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises in European Countries

“…In the empirical part of the research, we focused more closely on evaluating the impact of the covid-19 pandemic on the performance of SMEs by calculating the correlation through the Pearson coefficient. This method of determining intercorrelation is most commonly used for numerical variables and does not take into account the dependence of the variables, but treats them as equivalent (Muhaidat et al, 2022).…”

An Agent-Based Model for COVID-19 in Bangladesh

“…Through extensive simulation we attempted to identify a scaling factor, F to adjust the values of M (i.e., our contact matrix) to match the official cases. For the case when there is no lockdown, we finally adopted F = 1 6 and to calibrate for different degrees of lockdown (as well as to simulate the effect of different variants), we used the following range: 1 12 ≤ F ≤ 1 9 .…”

“…This is however, challenging as, arguably, due to various (non-)epidemiological and other parameters, COVID-19 spread has taken different pathways in different regions. Some of these pathways or pandemic trends are correlated while they can also have no similarity at all [1].…”