2022
DOI: 10.1007/s11356-022-18559-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predicting daily pore water pressure in embankment dam: Empowering Machine Learning-based modeling

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Even if a large number of features are missing, RF can still maintain accuracy. This method has been well applied in the prediction of PWP [34,35].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Even if a large number of features are missing, RF can still maintain accuracy. This method has been well applied in the prediction of PWP [34,35].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wei et al [3] showcased the enhanced precision and robustness of gated recurrent unit (GRU) and Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) models in predicting slope seepage/stability under rainfall compared to the standard RNNs. RF has been applied to the prediction of daily pore water pressure in the embankment [34,35], and MLP has been used in the case of concrete dam seepage behavior [9]. RNNs and GRU are applied in pore water pressure prediction of a tunnel boring machine [36] and slope [3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, to rank the models for simulation purposes, EL Bilali et al [47] suggested the classification of the machine learning models according to categories of perfect, excellent, good, and poor models in terms of GA as follows:…”
Section: Rmsementioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the advancement of computer technology, machine learning techniques have gradually been applied to the analysis of dam safety monitoring data [33,34]. Intelligent monitoring models such as random forests, neural networks, extreme learning machines, and others have shown significant improvements in prediction accuracy compared to traditional models, enabling more accurate predictions of dam safety states [35][36][37][38].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%