2017
DOI: 10.19080/ctbeb.2017.07.555715
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predicting Diabetic Readmission Rates: Moving Beyond Hba1c

Abstract: Hospital readmission is considered an effective measurement of care provided within healthcare. Being able to risk identify patients facing a high likelihood of unplanned hospital readmission in the next 30-days could allow for further investigation and possibly prevent the readmission. Current models, such as LACE, sacrifice accuracy in order to allow for end-users to have a straight forward and simple experience. This study acknowledges that while HbA1c is important, it may not be critical in predicting read… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Hence clustering was performed to group similar observations into the same group (cluster). As this study focuses on improving the current classification models and not bringing up novel pre-processing techniques, this clustering step will mainly follow the scheme from existing literature [11], [14].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Hence clustering was performed to group similar observations into the same group (cluster). As this study focuses on improving the current classification models and not bringing up novel pre-processing techniques, this clustering step will mainly follow the scheme from existing literature [11], [14].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the data used is old compared to the other models and there might be possible improvements in the factor selection process as 33 out of 56 variables were used for analysis. In [11], through Machine Learning algorithm achieved 0.70 -079 c-statistics respectively for 30-70 and 0-30 age group on the same dataset with a sensitivity of 43.63% -49.78% and specificity of 82.62% -89.19%. Compare to the two previous models, the researcher applied a different algorithm to each defined population segments.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 87%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In [9], several different classifications were proposed, as the study divided patients into 3 groups according to Age [<30, between [30 -70], > 70]. A separate model was built for each group using some ML algorithms or combining them such as (random forest, different types of gradient enhanced trees, and SVM).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%