2022
DOI: 10.1101/2022.12.05.519094
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predicting distributed working memory activity in a large-scale mouse brain: the importance of the cell type-specific connectome

Abstract: Recent advances in connectomic and neurophysiological tools make it possible to probe whole-brain mechanisms in the mouse that underlie cognition and behavior. Based on experimental data, we developed a large-scale model of the mouse brain for a cardinal cognitive function called working memory, the brain's ability to internally hold and process information without sensory input. In the model, interregional connectivity is constrained by mesoscopic connectome data. The density of parvalbumin-expressing interne… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
15
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 131 publications
3
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This suggests that the linearity of hierarchical interactions between human brain areas eliminates those restrictions for the human brain, providing additional flexibility in the way top-down projections might modulate perception in the case of humans. Differences with the case of mice are even more salient: while current efforts identify gradients of inhibitory neuron density as a fundamental factor for the distributed patterns 33 , our model suggests that variations in NMDAr densities are enough to explain the evidence in humans. More detailed models will allow for a deep computational study of the differences in working memory mechanisms across these and other species.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 75%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This suggests that the linearity of hierarchical interactions between human brain areas eliminates those restrictions for the human brain, providing additional flexibility in the way top-down projections might modulate perception in the case of humans. Differences with the case of mice are even more salient: while current efforts identify gradients of inhibitory neuron density as a fundamental factor for the distributed patterns 33 , our model suggests that variations in NMDAr densities are enough to explain the evidence in humans. More detailed models will allow for a deep computational study of the differences in working memory mechanisms across these and other species.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…On the other hand, computational modeling work has explored the idea of distributed working memory in macaques across various levels of detail along recent years 23,[48][49][50] , with the first complete computational study of distributed working memory in a data-constrained macaque network recently proposing the core mechanistic principles of the phenomenon 32 . While similar efforts have been carried out for the case of mice 33 , the case of distributed working memory in humans had not been tackled until now.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…1 D). Building on experimental findings [30][31][32][33][34][35], we designed the PPC network such that it integrates activity over a longer timescale compared to the WM network (Sect. 3.1).…”
Section: The Ppc As a Slower Integrator Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous quantifications of labeled neurons in the PV-cre mouse line led to the conclusion that association areas are under a lower inhibitory control because of the low density of PV-INs (Whissel et al, 2015;Kim et al, 2017;Ding et al, 2023). However, the total GABAergic population has not yet been quantified, and other GABAergic types might take on the role of PV-INs in association areas.…”
Section: Comparison Of the Gabaergic Population Of Primary Sensory An...mentioning
confidence: 99%