2019
DOI: 10.1080/10298436.2019.1655563
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predicting excess vehicle fuel use due to pavement structural response using field test results and finite element modelling

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The simulated deflection basin, along with the applied 3D contact stresses, were used to calculate excess energy consumption. Studies have suggested that excess energy consumption is a function of pavement structure, material properties, temperature, and vehicle loading ( 9 , 12 , 41 ). Figure 8 shows the computed results at different wheel loads and two pavement temperature profiles.…”
Section: Computation Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The simulated deflection basin, along with the applied 3D contact stresses, were used to calculate excess energy consumption. Studies have suggested that excess energy consumption is a function of pavement structure, material properties, temperature, and vehicle loading ( 9 , 12 , 41 ). Figure 8 shows the computed results at different wheel loads and two pavement temperature profiles.…”
Section: Computation Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Zaabar and Chatti ( 7 ) estimated that heavy trucks driven over asphalt pavements consume about 4% more energy than those driven over concrete pavements. It was also reported that the difference in fuel consumption of various classes of vehicles moving on different asphalt pavement structures is around 4%–7% ( 7 9 ). However, in these experimental studies, the effect of SRR was difficult to be differentiated from other contributing factors, such as pavement texture and roughness.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…( a ) Hot remixing; ( b ) lift compaction; ( c ) rolling compaction; ( d ) removal of excess binder; ( e ) milling simulation; ( f ) tack coat application; ( g ) coring; ( h ) shear testing prepration; and ( i ) shearing. ( 23 )…”
Section: Laboratory Test Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Adverse field conditions were meticulously simulated in the laboratory to account for conditions such as rainfall, dusty interface, and streaking. The details of the laboratory procedure are explained in the authors’ previous works ( 21 , 23 , 24 ). Table 1 summarizes the factors and the naming convention used in this study.…”
Section: Laboratory Test Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation