2000
DOI: 10.2307/177496
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predicting Extinction: Progress with an Individual-Based Model of Protozoan Predators and Prey

Abstract: JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The experiment continued for 21 days, by which time food webs in undivided 270 mL volumes had collapsed to just C. striatum and bacteria, or these species with B. americanum. These species combinations are capable of persisting for long periods, even in small undivided habitats (Holyoak & Lawler 1996b; Morin 1999; Holyoak et al . 2000).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The experiment continued for 21 days, by which time food webs in undivided 270 mL volumes had collapsed to just C. striatum and bacteria, or these species with B. americanum. These species combinations are capable of persisting for long periods, even in small undivided habitats (Holyoak & Lawler 1996b; Morin 1999; Holyoak et al . 2000).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The interpretation of zero densities is complicated by the fact that zero density values from subsamples have a certain probability of representing a real extinction from an entire 30 mL bottle (a patch). In an earlier experiment, the probability of a single recorded zero density value representing a real extinction was 0.39, which was calculated by comparing subsamples with entire bottle contents (Holyoak, in press). For simplicity, the raw numbers of recorded zero densities for C. striatum (in Table 1) were used as an indicator of the frequency of actual extinction within array bottles and the duration of periods of absence.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The precise time of population extinction is invariably unpredictable due to the contributions of demographic stochasticity (MacArthur and Wilson 1967, Richter-Dyn and Goel 1972, Melbourne and Hastings 2008, environmental catastrophe (Lande 1993, Casagrandi andGatto 2002) and interspecific interactions (Chesson and Ellner 1989, Holyoak et al 2000, Tilman 2004, Ferguson and Ponciano 2014 to the final stages of decline. Accordingly, the majority of dynamical models used to study extinction are stochastic with the consequence that the extinction time is a random variable.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous theoretical work has examined stochastic extinction for predator-prey systems (Donalson and Nisbet 1999, Holyoak et al 2000, Grasman 2001, Sabo 2005, Kramer and Drake 2010 and Lotka-Volterra models of competition (Allen 1983, Renshaw 1993, Roeger and Allen 2004, Chan and Franke 2004, Baxter et al 2005, Fiasconaro and Spagnolo 2007. Studies of predator-prey systems make it clear that details of the interaction mechanism, such as predator functional response during hunting, may have a large effect on extinction probability (Kramer and Drake 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Holyoak et al. () argues that “with cyclical dynamics, the timing and likelihood of extinction may be [amongst others] a function of the density cycles”.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%