Predicting Face Recognition Skills in Children from Holistic Face Processing and Eye Tracking

Corrow, Sherryse; Donlon, Tobias; Mathison, Jordan; Adamson, Vanessa; Yonas, Albert

doi:10.1167/13.9.104

Cited by 2 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Eye-tracking research has demonstrated that, when perceiving a face, individuals spontaneously dedicate less attention to the forehead region than regions containing salient features such as the eyes (Heisz & Shore, 2008; Nguyen, Isaacowitz, & Rubin, 2009). This relative inattention to the forehead region may be adaptive for face recognition purposes, as greater visual attention to the forehead region has been found to be associated with a weaker ability to recognize faces (Corrow, Donlon, Mathison, Adamson, & Yonas, 2013). However, for observational drawing, accurate perceptual encoding of the spatial extent of the forehead region is important in order to accurately reproduce the spatial configuration of the features within a face.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Why do non-artists draw the eyes too far up the head? How vertical eye-drawing errors relate to schematic knowledge, pseudoneglect, and context-based perceptual biases.

Ostrofsky

Kozbelt

Tumminia

et al. 2016

Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Nonartists are biased to position the eyes too far up the head when drawing a face from observation. This study aims to determine how schematic knowledge, perceptual processing of the scalp-line, and altitudinal pseudoneglect are related to this bias. Participants were randomly assigned to receive or not receive the schematic knowledge that the eyes are positioned approximately halfway down the head. Participants then drew 2 faces, a bald male and a nonbald male, and completed a vertical line bisection task to measure pseudoneglect. Results suggest that schematic knowledge reduces, but does not eliminate, this bias and alters attentional processes guiding face drawing-because participants lacking schematic knowledge made larger errors when drawing a bald model, while those with schematic knowledge did not. Further, upward biases in the line bisection task were positively correlated with upward eye-drawing errors only for participants given schematic knowledge. This suggests that there are different reasons why individuals draw the eyes too far up the head: inattention to the forehead region for those lacking schematic knowledge versus attentional pseudoneglect of visual information in the lower visual field for those with schematic knowledge.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Why do non-artists draw the eyes too far up the head? How vertical eye-drawing errors relate to schematic knowledge, pseudoneglect, and context-based perceptual biases.

Ostrofsky

Kozbelt

Tumminia

et al. 2016

Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…[5] shows that the eyebrows mainly play the role of markers for estimating the distances between the different parts of a face while the eyes are truly discriminating areas for recognition. To confirm the importance of the eyes, the mouth and the nose, studies show that other face regions, such as the chin, forehead and neck [6] are not important in the identification process.…”

Section: Face Identification and Expressions Recognitionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Face de-identification with expressions preservation

Letournel¹,

Bugeau²,

Ta³

et al. 2015

2015 IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP)

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This paper addresses an application that has not been much explored, the de-identification of faces with expressions preservation in images. With the huge amount of images and videos shared on the Internet, protecting the identity of people in the data becomes crucial. Removing the identity information is often referred as de-identification. In this paper, we propose a novel de-identification process that preserves the important clues on the face for further behavior or emotions analysis. It is a difficult problem because obtaining the anonymity implies deteriorating the main face components. At the opposite, analyzing the expressions requires keeping enough information on the face such as, for instance, the gaze or the corners of the lips. Our approach relies on face and key points detection, followed by a variational adaptive filtering. Experimental results show the potential of the proposed method and open new insights for image dissemination or video broadcasting.

show abstract

Predicting Face Recognition Skills in Children from Holistic Face Processing and Eye Tracking

Cited by 2 publications

References 0 publications

Why do non-artists draw the eyes too far up the head? How vertical eye-drawing errors relate to schematic knowledge, pseudoneglect, and context-based perceptual biases.

Why do non-artists draw the eyes too far up the head? How vertical eye-drawing errors relate to schematic knowledge, pseudoneglect, and context-based perceptual biases.

Face de-identification with expressions preservation

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About