2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2009.03.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predicting Fitness to Drive in People With Cognitive Impairments by Using DriveSafe and DriveAware

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
103
0
4

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 71 publications
(111 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
4
103
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Recently, two driving studies used Item Response Theory to develop or evaluate driving scales: one to convert a standard on-road test to a Rasch scale and the other to develop a measure of driving confidence (Kay, Bundy, & Clemson, 2009;Kay, Bundy, Clemson, & Jolly, 2008;Myers, Paradis, & Blanchard, 2008). Neither studied safe driving from a comprehensive personvehicle-environment approach, in the driving context, to provide an entry point for occupational therapy intervention.…”
Section: Limitations and Future Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, two driving studies used Item Response Theory to develop or evaluate driving scales: one to convert a standard on-road test to a Rasch scale and the other to develop a measure of driving confidence (Kay, Bundy, & Clemson, 2009;Kay, Bundy, Clemson, & Jolly, 2008;Myers, Paradis, & Blanchard, 2008). Neither studied safe driving from a comprehensive personvehicle-environment approach, in the driving context, to provide an entry point for occupational therapy intervention.…”
Section: Limitations and Future Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many of the off-road cognitive or perceptual assessments have limited evidence of reliability and validity (Unsworth, Lovell, Terrington & Thomas, 2005), and as few as 5% of driving assessors base their decisions on safety to drive on the off-road cognitive or perceptual assessments alone (Mazer et al, 1998). The on-road driver assessment component has been found to be the most important component of the comprehensive driving assessment procedure, and there is a growing body of research around the validity and reliability of these tests (Kay, Bundy & Clemson, 2009;Ponsford et al, 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Five published driving studies applied Rasch analysis to develop or evaluate driving scales (Kay, Bundy, & Clemson, 2008, 2009Myers, Paradis, & Blanchard, 2008;Patomella, Kottorp, & Tham, 2008;Patomella, Tham, & Kottorp, 2006). Patomella and colleagues (2006) first applied Rasch analysis to examine the Performance Analysis of Driving Ability (P-Drive) using a driving simulator with 31 people with brain injury; they later (Patomella et al, 2008) used Rasch analysis to evaluate the P-Drive with 101 people with stroke.…”
Section: Rater Effectsmentioning
confidence: 99%