2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2019.01.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predicting flares in patients with stable systemic lupus erythematosus

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
1
10
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The clinical manifestations, serologic findings and treatment of the cohort had been described in other publications. 15 Briefly, the most common manifestations were leukopenia (68.1%), arthritis (59.5%) and non-scarring alopecia (40%). Anti-nuclear antibody was positive in 94.8%, and anti-double stranded DNA was positive in 90.5%, 90% were treated with HCQ and 76.7% were on maintenance immunosuppression (azathioprine, mycophenolate mofetil, calcineurin inhibitors, methotrexate, leflunomide, cyclophosphamide, belimumab, or rituximab).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The clinical manifestations, serologic findings and treatment of the cohort had been described in other publications. 15 Briefly, the most common manifestations were leukopenia (68.1%), arthritis (59.5%) and non-scarring alopecia (40%). Anti-nuclear antibody was positive in 94.8%, and anti-double stranded DNA was positive in 90.5%, 90% were treated with HCQ and 76.7% were on maintenance immunosuppression (azathioprine, mycophenolate mofetil, calcineurin inhibitors, methotrexate, leflunomide, cyclophosphamide, belimumab, or rituximab).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although several studies have assessed the prognostic impact of serum anti-dsDNA levels in clinically quiescent SLE (Table 1), their interpretation is hampered by heterogeneity in the detection assay, definition of abnormal/high concentrations and duration of patient follow-up (Supplementary Table S6). 24,42,43,45,46,[50][51][52][53] Nonetheless, an increased incidence of flares (up to threefold) has been reported for patients at clinical remission who display high/increasing anti-dsDNA, especially high-avidity autoantibodies. 25,42,51,52 Accordingly, in a retrospective study of inactive SLE patients, addition of high anti-dsDNA to low C3 or C4 measurements enhanced the specificity for flare prediction (from 93.3% to 97.8% and from 41.9% to 71.0%, respectively).…”
Section: Anti-dsdna Levels At Clinical Remission and Risk Of Flaresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A number of studies have determined the flare predictive value of composite serological activity, defined as low C3 and/or low C4 and/or high anti-dsDNA levels, without reporting on individual serological markers. 41,50,55,[57][58][59] As an example, in a cohort of 152 SLE patients with stable/inactive disease who were followed for a median 31.5 months, C3 and/or C4 hypocomplementemia at baseline visit was linked to increased risk for severe relapses (multivariable HR 2.91; 95% CI 1.34-6.40). 50 Likewise, persistence of abnormal serology despite clinically inactive disease has been associated with increased and/or earlier incidence of relapses in patients with SLE 41,50,[57][58][59] and lupus nephritis.…”
Section: Composite Serological Activity and Serological Activity Asse...mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…They include age, disease duration, remission duration, high anti-dsDNA and hypocomplementaemia. [5][6][7] These factors were assessed in the interaction analysis of the CORTICOLUP study. To answer more specifically to the comment of Mousavi et al, demographic classifications such as 'African-American, Caucasians or Hispanics', although requested by some health authorities, are non-relevant in France and other parts of the word.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%