2011
DOI: 10.1007/s11104-011-1052-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predicting forest site productivity in temperate lowland from forest floor, soil and litterfall characteristics using boosted regression trees

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
51
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
2
51
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Also during data exploration all predictor variables were tested for ecologically acceptable level of collinearity (i.e. individual variance inflation factor (VIF) of less than five) between predictor variables (Zuur et al, 2010;Aertsen et al, 2012). In construction of BRT models, flea indices were used as response variable and individual land uses were used as predictor variables.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also during data exploration all predictor variables were tested for ecologically acceptable level of collinearity (i.e. individual variance inflation factor (VIF) of less than five) between predictor variables (Zuur et al, 2010;Aertsen et al, 2012). In construction of BRT models, flea indices were used as response variable and individual land uses were used as predictor variables.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Geocentric approaches have been used as a basis for estimating SI or other measures of forest productivity and involve relating SI to various direct and/or indirect environmental factors [1]. Many studies have revealed environmental predictors of SI, using edaphic [2][3][4][5], topographic [6][7][8], and/or climatic [9][10][11] variables. Geocentrically-based (biophysical) SI models are independent from stand age and structure, usually have satisfactory prediction power and, therefore, provide tools that can effectively inform forest management.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main advantages of this method are that the BRT scheme can analyze different types of variables and interaction effects among variables, and is applicable to nonlinear relationships. In recent years, the BRT technique has been used to examine the distribution of soil characteristics at a regional scale (Aertsen et al, 2011;Cools et al, 2014;Martin et al, 2011). Major outputs from BRT analyses can identify the following: (1) the relative importance (percentage of influence or contribution) of predictor variables (explanatory variables) on the basis of the weighted and scaled number of times a variable is selected for splitting (Elith et al, 2008) and (2) the relationships among variables and the explained variable shown in partial dependence plots.…”
Section: Boosted Regression Trees (Brt) Schemementioning
confidence: 99%