2019
DOI: 10.1007/s13177-019-00205-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predicting Freeway Incident Duration Using Machine Learning

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nevertheless, the SVM outperforms all other ML techniques, which was also reported by Hamad et al. (2019).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 81%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Nevertheless, the SVM outperforms all other ML techniques, which was also reported by Hamad et al. (2019).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 81%
“…A similar investigation was conducted by Hamad et al. (2019), where the performance of multiple ML approaches including regression trees, SVM, ensemble trees, ANN, and Gaussian process regression (GPR) in predicting incident duration was assessed. The results revealed that SVM and GPR performed the best over other ML techniques in terms of MAE, yet they required the longest training time over other ML techniques.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In recent years, many scholars have reviewed previous machine learning models of event duration [ 29 , 30 ], in which Khaled retrieved more than 110,000 incident records with over 52 variables from the Houston TranStar data archive. Five machine learning algorithms including regression decision tree, SVM, ensemble tree, Gaussian process regression, and artificial neural network (ANN) were compared [ 31 ]. In 2022, Grigorev presented a novel bi-level machine learning framework enhanced with outlier removal and intra–extra joint optimization and found the optimal threshold between short-term versus long-term traffic incident duration.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A detailed description of the RF model is beyond the scope of this manuscript. Further information on RF methods can be found in Baker and Ellison (2008) and Hamad et al (2019).…”
Section: ) Untangling Vza Sza Amf and Pwvmentioning
confidence: 99%