1998
DOI: 10.1006/jmbi.1998.2144
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predicting function: from genes to genomes and back 1 1Edited by P. E. Wright

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

1
264
0
6

Year Published

1999
1999
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 411 publications
(271 citation statements)
references
References 137 publications
1
264
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…The classic tool to do so, homology detection, is mainly suited to predict the molecular function of a protein. Because we have complete genome sequences we would also like to know proteins' functions at a higher level [1], for example the pathway or complex a protein belongs to.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The classic tool to do so, homology detection, is mainly suited to predict the molecular function of a protein. Because we have complete genome sequences we would also like to know proteins' functions at a higher level [1], for example the pathway or complex a protein belongs to.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, many instances of gaps in metabolic pathways have been reported, especially when arbitrary similarity cutoffs were imposed in the database searches. Comparative protein sequence analysis, with the attention to both close and more distant similarities, remains the principal method of function prediction and pathway reconstruction (Tatusov et al 1996;Koonin et al 1997;Bork et al 1998). In the attempt to break through the "similarity barrier", complementary approaches have been proposed, including identification of genes that are physically close, and presumably coordinately regulated, in multiple genomes (Overbeek et al 1999), and the use of phyletic profiles, i.e., the occurrence in some genomes of sets of genes that are missing in others (Tatusov et al 1997;Pellegrini et al 1999).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Biological function is an abstract term that can be applied to different scales -from biomolecules via cells to species and large ecosystems [1]. Although biologists are comfortable talking about the concept of function, we often struggle when it comes to quantifying it.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is partly due to our limited understanding of the underlying biological processes, which prevents us from creating a semantic framework to describe our findings. In addition, a full description of biological function has to take into account both its temporal and its spatial aspects; this has been historically hampered by the lack of adequate data [1]. Today, the most important agents of biological function -proteins -are being catalogued on a variety of scales, from macromolecular complexes at the subcellular level (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%