Abstract-A number of therapies are emerging that have the potential to reduce poststroke disability by promoting repair.Careful evaluation of patients with stroke might help distinguish those who are most likely to respond to a restorative therapy from those who lack biological substrate needed to achieve gains. Potential approaches to such stratification are considered, including measures of brain injury or of poststroke brain function. (Stroke. 2010;41[suppl 1]:S114-S116.)Key Words: stroke â
˘ treatment â
˘ recovery â
˘ repair â
˘ stratify A n acute stroke initiates a number of events. Chief among these is brain injury, including the ischemic cascade, penumbra and its evolution, delayed neuronal loss, and apoptosis. However, a stroke also sets into motion a series of events related to repair. Within the first few days of an infarct, the brain initiates a number of processes related to restoration of function, such as increased expression of growth-associated genes, elevated levels of growth factors, angiogenesis, greater endogenous neural stem cell proliferation and migration, and increased dendritic arborization and synaptogenesis. 1,2 These events represent biological targets for a class of therapies that fall under the rubric of brain repair. Although most patients show some degree of spontaneous behavioral improvement in the weeks-months after a stroke, this recovery is generally incomplete, and as a result stroke remains a major cause of human disability. 3 Brain repair therapies introduced during the days-weeks after stroke onset do not target neuroprotection; rather, such therapies aim to amplify innate repair mechanisms and thereby further improve behavioral outcomes after stroke. A growing literature also documents the ability of such interventions to improve behavioral status when introduced in the chronic phase, months-years after stroke, likely on the backbone of similar repair-based mechanisms.A number of therapeutic classes are under investigation to promote brain repair after stroke. 4 The list includes growth factors, other large molecules such as monoclonal antibodies, stem cells, physiotherapy-based interventions, robotic devices, electromagnetic stimulation, neuroprosthetics, and small molecules. Small molecule approaches are wideranging and include drugs that modulate level of activity within specific neurotransmitter systems, vitamins, phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, and more. The preclinical literature is blossoming with such studies, and many have been examined in human trials, including phase III trials in some cases. 5,6