2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.pacfin.2014.01.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predicting future price volatility: Empirical evidence from an emerging limit order market

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 74 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…3 The only related study is Jain and Jiang (2014), which shows that the limit order book slope consistently and significantly predicts future price volatility. However, the paper does not model the price impact of incoming orders nor evaluates the forecast accuracy of volatility.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3 The only related study is Jain and Jiang (2014), which shows that the limit order book slope consistently and significantly predicts future price volatility. However, the paper does not model the price impact of incoming orders nor evaluates the forecast accuracy of volatility.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The impact is, 2 Our sample compares favourably to 50 US stocks for a sample period of 21 days in Cont et al (2014); 30 stocks in the Euronext Amsterdam exchange with a two-month sample periods in Hautsch and Huang (2012); and 100 stocks in Nasdaq over two years in Engle and Patton (2004). 3 The only related study is Jain and Jiang (2014), which shows that the limit order book slope consistently and significantly predicts future price volatility. However, the paper does not model the price impact of incoming orders nor evaluates the forecast accuracy of volatility.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Other variables other than price returns have been used to forecast price volatility. Jain and Jiang [9] aim to predict future price volatility using the limit order book (LOB) from the Shanghai Stock Exchange (SHSE). The data is obtained from SHSE from January 2009 to December 2009.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%