SPE Reservoir Simulation Symposium 1999
DOI: 10.2118/51910-ms
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predicting Gas Condensate Well Productivity Using Capillary Number and Non-Darcy Effects

Abstract: fax 01-972-952-9435. AbstractThe objective of this work was to provide a more accurate prediction of well and reservoir performance for gas and gas condensate reservoirs by investigating near-wellbore effects. Specifically, the effects of non-Darcy flow and changes in relative permeability due to interfacial tension (1FT), and flow rate (modeled based on capillary number) on well productivity are considered. These effects are shown to be important factors affecting the productivity index (PI) of gas condensate… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It also have been shown that the productivity index of a gas condensate well is affected by changes in relative permeability due to IFT, gravity and flow rate (modeled based on capillary number). Narayanaswamy et al 39 showed that when capillary number effects are considered, high capillary numbers seen in the near wellbore region can significantly reduce condensate saturation and increase gas relative permeability resulting in productivity greater than when capillary number effects are not considered. They also showed that accurate measurement of the critical condensate saturation and endpoint relative permeabilities at various capillary numbers is very important for accurate prediction of the productivity index.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It also have been shown that the productivity index of a gas condensate well is affected by changes in relative permeability due to IFT, gravity and flow rate (modeled based on capillary number). Narayanaswamy et al 39 showed that when capillary number effects are considered, high capillary numbers seen in the near wellbore region can significantly reduce condensate saturation and increase gas relative permeability resulting in productivity greater than when capillary number effects are not considered. They also showed that accurate measurement of the critical condensate saturation and endpoint relative permeabilities at various capillary numbers is very important for accurate prediction of the productivity index.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because of high flow rates, inertial forces are active in the reservoir, in particular close to the wellbore, where nonDarcy flow are causing an additional draw down pressure drop in the well. Several authors have been studying this problem [11][12][13] where numerical simulations normally are needed to distinguish the physical effects related to two-phase flow and non-Darcy flow.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This model includes the dependence of gas-relative permeability on interfacial tension, pressure gradient and buoyancy forces. Narayanaswamy et al (1999) showed that the condensate saturation and gas-relative permeability near the wellbore are a strong function of the trapping number. They also found that the effects of condensate dropout on gas-relative permeability are closely coupled with non-Darcy effects that can be significant in high-rate wells.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They also found that the effects of condensate dropout on gas-relative permeability are closely coupled with non-Darcy effects that can be significant in high-rate wells. Narayanaswamy et al (1999) have shown that reservoir heterogeneity plays an important role in determining the effective of non-Darcy flow coefficient for gas inflow into high-rate gas wells.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%