2018
DOI: 10.1029/2018wr023106
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predicting geogenic Arsenic in Drinking Water Wells in Glacial Aquifers, North‐Central USA: Accounting for Depth‐Dependent Features

Abstract: Chronic exposure to arsenic (As) via drinking groundwater is a human health concern worldwide. Probabilities of elevated geogenic As concentrations in groundwater were predicted in complex, glacial aquifers in Minnesota, north-central USA, a region that commonly has elevated As concentrations in well water. Maps of elevated As hazard were created for depths typical of drinking water supply and with well construction attributes common for domestic wells. Conventional variables describing aquifer properties and … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

1
26
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 69 publications
1
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Geogenic (i.e., naturally occurring) arsenic (As) contamination is a well‐known issue that affects unconsolidated and fractured aquifers worldwide (e.g., Choudhury et al, 2018; Desbarats et al, 2017; Erickson et al, 2018; Huang et al, 2018; Jakobsen et al, 2018; Pedretti et al, 2019), including Italian aquifers (e.g., Aiuppa et al, 2003; Carraro et al, 2013; Molinari et al, 2013; Rotiroti et al, 2014; Ungaro et al, 2008). Identifying a valid site‐specific conceptual model able to describe As mobility in groundwater is fundamental for many purposes related to As risk management.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Geogenic (i.e., naturally occurring) arsenic (As) contamination is a well‐known issue that affects unconsolidated and fractured aquifers worldwide (e.g., Choudhury et al, 2018; Desbarats et al, 2017; Erickson et al, 2018; Huang et al, 2018; Jakobsen et al, 2018; Pedretti et al, 2019), including Italian aquifers (e.g., Aiuppa et al, 2003; Carraro et al, 2013; Molinari et al, 2013; Rotiroti et al, 2014; Ungaro et al, 2008). Identifying a valid site‐specific conceptual model able to describe As mobility in groundwater is fundamental for many purposes related to As risk management.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specific areas of study have included the Southern High Plains of West Texas (Scanlon et al ), Inner Coastal Plain, New Jersey (Mumford et al. ), Western Snake River Plain, Idaho (Busbee et al ), New England and the Lower Illinois River (Ayotte et al ), and northwest and central Minnesota (Erickson et al ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bayesian network). Machine learning has already been applied to model other groundwater related variables such as, nitrate concentration (Nolan et al, 2015;Tesoriero et al, 2015), arsenic concentrations (Erickson et al, 2018;Winkel et al, 2011) or redox conditions in the subsurface (Close et al, 2016;Koch et al, 2019), and the potential to map the depth to the water table is tangible.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%