2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2012.10.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predicting Hospitalization in Children with Acute Asthma

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the present study, similar to Carroll et al, 2 we also wanted to examine the correlation of mPIS among raters. As a result, None 2:1 None 96& 1 120e140 100e120 31e45 21e35 Mild 1:1 End expiratory 93e95 2 141e160 121e140 46e60 36e50 Moderate 1:2 Inspiratory and expiratory wheeze, good aeration 90e92 3 160< 140< 60< 50< Severe 1:3 Inspiratory and expiratory wheeze, decreased aeration <90 correlations among 4 raters, of whom 2 were physicians and 2 were nurses, were very high irrespective of their professions or their working experience, supporting the results of the report by Carroll et al 2 Buyuktiryaki et al 11 showed that mPIS might be useful for the determination of admission for asthma attacks by making ROC curves, although they did not evaluate the correlation among raters. Our present study showed the possibility that mPIS might be also useful for the determination of a treatment plan, including the indication of CIT, and prediction of the period of hospitalization in admitted patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…In the present study, similar to Carroll et al, 2 we also wanted to examine the correlation of mPIS among raters. As a result, None 2:1 None 96& 1 120e140 100e120 31e45 21e35 Mild 1:1 End expiratory 93e95 2 141e160 121e140 46e60 36e50 Moderate 1:2 Inspiratory and expiratory wheeze, good aeration 90e92 3 160< 140< 60< 50< Severe 1:3 Inspiratory and expiratory wheeze, decreased aeration <90 correlations among 4 raters, of whom 2 were physicians and 2 were nurses, were very high irrespective of their professions or their working experience, supporting the results of the report by Carroll et al 2 Buyuktiryaki et al 11 showed that mPIS might be useful for the determination of admission for asthma attacks by making ROC curves, although they did not evaluate the correlation among raters. Our present study showed the possibility that mPIS might be also useful for the determination of a treatment plan, including the indication of CIT, and prediction of the period of hospitalization in admitted patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…As for MPIS, the score was eight on admission. After each of the three doses of salbutamol treatment, the MPIS was eight (5.75–11), seven and six , respectively (p < 0.001) (Table ), reflecting the gradual improvement in respiratory distress.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various studies with varying methodologies, sample sizes, and different settings had reported factors predicting hospitalization for asthma exacerbations in children ( Lyell et al, 2005 ; Buyuktiryaki et al, 2013 ; Alherbish et al, 2018 ). In a larger multicenter study in Turkey, severity of asthma exacerbations in children was a major predictive factor for hospitalization ( Buyuktiryaki et al, 2013 ). Contrary to our findings, male gender and administration of systemic steroid in the first hour predicted short period of hospitalization in the Turkish study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%