2010
DOI: 10.1080/10835547.2010.12091276
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predicting House Prices with Spatial Dependence: A Comparison of Alternative Methods

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
77
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 168 publications
(77 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
77
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In particular, the variables were selected on the basis of (i) the indications given by the market operators in the area, (ii) the data generated by OMI and (iii) research found in the reference literature [51][52][53][54]. In fact, several scientific papers pointed out the unavoidable tradeoff between bias from omitted factors and increased sampling variance related to the collinearity that is involved in this step [55], even if a relative agreement on the major influencing factors is observed [56][57][58].…”
Section: Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, the variables were selected on the basis of (i) the indications given by the market operators in the area, (ii) the data generated by OMI and (iii) research found in the reference literature [51][52][53][54]. In fact, several scientific papers pointed out the unavoidable tradeoff between bias from omitted factors and increased sampling variance related to the collinearity that is involved in this step [55], even if a relative agreement on the major influencing factors is observed [56][57][58].…”
Section: Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Upon inspection of these data points, no clear outliers are evident, indicating that these points may have high degrees of leverage or influence on the model. Bourassa et al (2010) found that property price predictions were more accurate when submarket dummy locational variables were used and the presence of spatial autocorrelation was mitigated. In order to formally test for the presence of spatial autocorrelation the Mantel test was computed.…”
Section: Variance Inflation Factormentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Broadly speaking, spatial autocorrelation can be defined as the dependence of observations across geographic locations, which has the propensity to render the standard errors of ordinary least squares models inefficient and biased (Liao & Wang 2012). Bourassa et al (2010) found that property price predictions were more accurate when submarket dummy locational variables were used in contrast to using traditional statistical methods alone; however, incorporating both methods yielded the best results. Notably they argue that the use of submarket dummy locational variables in ordinary least squares is a far simpler technique than trying to model the structure of the errors using complicated statistical methods, and the benefit was evident in their results.…”
Section: Residential Hedonic Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In many works the impact of location on prices is empirically demonstrated [30]. Contextually, the importance of geographical segmentation in price prediction is underlined in many researches [31][32][33][34][35].…”
Section: Analysis Of Pricing In Housing Economicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The pilot studies have been followed in the last decades by a number of publications worldwide, oriented towards the treatment and modeling of the spatial effects. In fact, the well-known criticalities due to the spatial heterogeneity (heteroskedasticity) and the spatial autocorrelation (interdependence) are explored [32], with the support of tests for the detection of spatial effects [36][37][38], opening the way to the Spatial Econometrics. Implicitly, the recent spreading in spatial analyses is related to the weight caught by the location variable in values formation.…”
Section: Analysis Of Pricing In Housing Economicsmentioning
confidence: 99%