This communication is in response to unsubstantiated claims, arising from misinterpretations and misrepresentations, made by Bogenfield and Kreikemeier in their recent paper, ''A tensorial based progressive damage model for fiber reinforced polymers"[1], on a damage model developed by Falzon et al. [2]. While details of this model have been extensively reported in a number of publications (e.g. [2-4]), and validated through comprehensive experimental programmes, this brief paper provides additional information on the damage model's formulation for the purpose of clarification and rebutting the conclusions in [1]. The test cases reported in [1], to demonstrate the apparent shortcomings of the damage model in [2], are repeated here to show that the alleged shortcomings are non-existent and consequently provide further support for the robustness and predictive capability of Falzon's progressive damage model.