2019
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.1910.11292
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predicting In-game Actions from Interviews of NBA Players

Abstract: Sports competitions are widely researched in computer and social science, with the goal of understanding how players act under uncertainty. While there is an abundance of computational work on player metrics prediction based on past performance, very few attempts to incorporate out-ofgame signals have been made. Specifically, it was previously unclear whether linguistic signals gathered from players' interviews can add information which does not appear in performance metrics. To bridge that gap, we define text… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
(48 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Another similar dataset, BALLGAME (Keshet et al, 2011) is comprised of baseball commentary with annotated events and timestamps, but it contains less than 20 games and the annotation is unavailable online. Some work focuses on sports-related inference of player performance metrics (Oved et al, 2019) or game outcomes (Velichkov et al, 2019) that predict full-time results based on signals from pre-game player interviews. However, no in-game sequential contexts are provided in these datasets.…”
Section: Information Densitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another similar dataset, BALLGAME (Keshet et al, 2011) is comprised of baseball commentary with annotated events and timestamps, but it contains less than 20 games and the annotation is unavailable online. Some work focuses on sports-related inference of player performance metrics (Oved et al, 2019) or game outcomes (Velichkov et al, 2019) that predict full-time results based on signals from pre-game player interviews. However, no in-game sequential contexts are provided in these datasets.…”
Section: Information Densitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another interesting concept that we can explore using the reviews dataset is Topics, as captured by the Latent Dirichlet Allocation (LDA) model (Blei, Ng, and Jordan 2003). Topics capture high-level semantics of documents, and are widely used in NLP for many language understanding purposes (Boyd-Graber et al 2017;Oved, Feder, and Reichart 2019). Topics are qualitatively different from Adjectives, as Adjectives are concrete and local while Topics are abstract and global.…”
Section: The Causal Effect Of Topics On Sentiment Classificationmentioning
confidence: 99%