2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2008.12.029
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predicting judged similarity of natural categories from their neural representations

Abstract: We report a combined behavioral and functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) study of conceptual similarity among members of a natural category (mammals). The study examined the relationship between computed pairwise similarity of neural responses to viewed mammals (e.g. bear, camel, dolphin) and subjective pairwise similarity ratings of the same set of mammals, obtained from subjects after the scanning session. In each functional region of interest (fROI), measures of neural similarity were compared to be… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
62
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 82 publications
(64 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
1
62
1
Order By: Relevance
“…When comparing between studies, it is important to ensure that similarity values are based on the same mathematical formulation. For instance, Weber et al (2009) report higher Pearson correlation values than we obtained, but these pertain to a correlation between fMRI and behavioral data (secondorder similarity). To our knowledge, only Mitchell et al (2008) has reported cosine similarity values in a comparable manner.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 55%
“…When comparing between studies, it is important to ensure that similarity values are based on the same mathematical formulation. For instance, Weber et al (2009) report higher Pearson correlation values than we obtained, but these pertain to a correlation between fMRI and behavioral data (secondorder similarity). To our knowledge, only Mitchell et al (2008) has reported cosine similarity values in a comparable manner.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 55%
“…In a study of monkeys viewing visual objects, Op de Beeck et al (2001) compared behavioural and neural population code similarity measures and found them to be somewhat congruent. In human fMRI studies, a number of recent studies have directly compared and found positive correlations between behavioural judgments of similarity and multivoxel fMRI pattern similarity in ventral temporal cortex (Op de Beeck et al, 2008;Walther et al, 2009;Weber et al, 2009), including changes in pattern-similarity following learning by the subjects (Op de Beeck et al, 2006;Li et al, 2008). Learning-related changes can also affect similarity judgments indirectly, by inducing changes in neural and behavioural discrimination criteria (Li et al, 2009).…”
Section: Beyond Stimulus Representations: Relating Pattern Informmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A number of studies have demonstrated that various basic categories of objects (e.g., Cox andNeuroImage 57 (2011) 482-494 Savoy, 2003;Haxby et al, 2001), scenes (Peelen et al, 2009;Walther et al, 2009), facial expressions (Said et al, 2010), vocal emotions (Ethofer et al, 2009), odors (Howard et al, 2009) etc., as well as simple visual features like orientation (e.g., Haynes and Rees, 2005;Kamitani and Tong, 2005) and color (Brouwer and Heeger, 2009;Parkes et al, 2009), can be decoded from the pattern of brain activity. Moreover, by analyzing the patterns of activity in various brain regions, recent studies have been able to show that higher-order visual areas represent objects categorically and hierarchically (Kriegeskorte et al, 2008) and represent objects within categories or with particular shapes in perceptually relevant ways (Haushofer et al, 2008;Op de Beeck et al, 2008Weber et al, 2009). We therefore believed that this type of analysis had the potential to read out categorical representations of materials in the brain.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%