Predicting Learning: Comparing Study Techniques, Perseverance, and Metacognitive Skill

Abstract

Background: Instructors and students are on a continuing quest to identify predictors of learning. Objective: This study examines the associations between self-reported exam score and study techniques among students in two courses, Introductory Psychology and Computer Science. Method: We used an online survey to measure the extent students ( N = 249) used 10 techniques studied in cognitive science. We also measured students’ perseverance, metacognitive skill, distractions, and procrastination. Results: Student use of specific study techniques varied between the two courses and a high utility technique, practice testing, was well used. Students reported low levels of spaced practice. Perseverance and metacognitive skills both correlated significantly with many of the study techniques. While no study techniques predicted exam scores in Introductory Psychology beyond variance predicted by GPA, the use of spaced practice predicted a significant portion of variance in students in Computer Science. Conclusions: Students’ use of study techniques varies between their courses and while related to GPA and exam scores, are not unique predictors of variance in learning. Additional moderators and mediators of learning need to be identified. Teaching Implications: We discuss ways instructors can help prepare students in Introductory Psychology and key needs for future research on studying.

What does it mean to prepare for class? A case study on students’ study habits in a nursing educational programme

“…Research on effective study strategies has a long history (Hattie, Biggs and Purdie, 1996;Fleming, 2002) and there is no universal study pattern that suits all students. However, there is limited research on how students actually study and prepare for class (Tomes, Wasylkiw and Mockler, 2011;Boevé et al, 2016;Fergus et al, 2021;Gurung et al, 2022;Blasiman, Dunlosky and Rawson et al, 2017), despite the crucial role of study habits in students' learning progress and academic success (Lorås et al, 2021).…”

I Believe I Can Try: Self-Efficacy, Pandemic Behaviors, Coping, and Learning

“…In addition to measures of stress, coping, and learning, we selected variables shown to relate to students' academic performance. In particular, research has established that study behaviors, ratings of the professor, and student and instructor classroom behaviors all predict learning (Dunlosky et al, 2013;Gurung et al, 2022;Richmond et al, 2021). For example, an instructor's behaviors can also play important roles in student learning, especially in influencing student effort (Geier, 2022).…”

“…There are a number of investigations into key elements of the teaching-learning equation. Studies assessed different approaches to asynchronous learning, student study habits, objective and subjective learning, satisfaction with education, and barriers to learning (Gonzalez-Ramirez et al, 2021;Gurung et al, 2022;Keržičet al, 2021;Kim et al, 2021a;Schreiber, 2021), all of which were impacted by the transition to emergency remote teaching modalities during the COVID-19 lockdowns. In this study, we build on previous work to take a more nuanced look at pandemic learning.…”

Future-Proofing Supply Chain Education

“…Keep in mind that we do not have to reinvent the wheel when it comes to strategies and practices that foster our students’ learning, but ought to seek connections across our campuses to find those who are already equipped with good ideas we can adopt. Thus, we strongly encourage supply chain researchers and educators to consider the vast amount of valuable literature from the fields of cognitive and educational psychology (e.g., Dunlosky and Rawson 2019; Gurung et al 2022; Agarwal, Nunes, and Blunt 2021).…”