2020
DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2020.00237
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predicting Long-Term After-Effects of Theta-Burst Stimulation on Supplementary Motor Network Through One-Session Response

Abstract: To understand the neural mechanism of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS), the after-effects following one session or multiple days of stimulation have been widely investigated. However, the relation between the short-term effect (STE) and long-term effect (LTE) of rTMS is largely unknown. This study aims to explore whether the after-effects of 5-day rTMS on supplementary motor area (SMA) network could be predicted by one-session response. A primary cohort of 38 healthy participants underwent f… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

4
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One schizophrenia and two healthy datasets ( n = 65) were included to cross‐validate the target‐network mechanism of rTMS. All data were from previously published works (Chen et al, 2018 ; Ji et al, 2020 ). In the schizophrenia cohort, 16 patients received real continuous theta‐burst magnetic stimulation (cTBS) over the left temporo‐parietal junction.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…One schizophrenia and two healthy datasets ( n = 65) were included to cross‐validate the target‐network mechanism of rTMS. All data were from previously published works (Chen et al, 2018 ; Ji et al, 2020 ). In the schizophrenia cohort, 16 patients received real continuous theta‐burst magnetic stimulation (cTBS) over the left temporo‐parietal junction.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After 2 weeks of treatment, the primary outcome (i.e., auditory hallucination) was significantly alleviated (Chen et al, 2018 ). In the first healthy cohort, participants were randomly assigned to receive real ( n = 16) or sham ( n = 17) cTBS over the left SMA for 5 days (Ji et al, 2020 ). The second healthy cohort ( n = 16) was recruited to test the reproducibility of the first cohort.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Matsuta et al ( 2022 ) further add that cTBS to the left motor representation of the abductor pollicis brevis (APB) had no consequences on resting state network activity, including the default mode network (DMN) and primary motor network. Regarding resting-state functional connectivity ([rs]FC) however, cTBS to the M1 hand (Hu et al 2017 ) and suprahyoid muscle (Ruan et al 2017 , 2019 ) representations, as well as the SMA (Ji et al 2017 , 2020 ) resulted in reduced network rsFC. Timing of post-stimulation follow-ups might, however, be a critical factor.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Each session of iTBS lasted 190 s and consisted of three pulses transmitted at 50 Hz, which was repeated every 200 ms (at 5 Hz) for a total of 600 pulses (34). According to previous methodological research, this 190-s protocol was repeated thrice (1,800 pulses in total) to obtain cumulative aftereffects, with 15 min between each session (controlled by a stopwatch) (35)(36)(37). According to the five-step procedure (38), the resting motor threshold (RMT) was measured at each visit and iTBS was delivered at 80% of the RMT (39).…”
Section: Neuro-navigated Transcranial Magnetic Stimulationmentioning
confidence: 99%