Predicting Maize Phenology: Intercomparison of Functions for Developmental Response to Temperature

Abstract

Accurate prediction of phenological development in maize (Zea mays L.) is fundamental to determining crop adaptation and yield potential. A number of thermal functions are used in crop models, but their relative precision in predicting maize development has not been quantified. The objectives of this study were (i) to evaluate the precision of eight thermal functions, (ii) to assess the effects of source data on the ability to differentiate among thermal functions, and (iii) to attribute the precision of thermal functions to their response across various temperature ranges. Data sets used in this study represent >1000 distinct maize hybrids, >50 geographic locations, and multiple planting dates and years. Thermal functions and calendar days were evaluated and grouped based on their temperature response and derivation as empirical linear, empirical nonlinear, and process-based functions. Precision in predicting phase durations from planting to anthesis or silking and from silking to physiological maturity was evaluated. Large data sets enabled increased differentiation of thermal functions, even when smaller data sets contained orthogonal, multi-location and -year data. At the highest level of differentiation, precision of thermal functions was in the order calendar days < empirical linear < process based < empirical nonlinear. Precision was associated with relatively low temperature sensitivity across the 10 to 26°C range. In contrast to other thermal functions, process-based functions were derived using supra-optimal temperatures, and consequently, they may better represent the developmental response of maize to supra-optimal temperatures. Supra-optimal temperatures could be more prevalent under future climate-change scenarios, but data sets in this study contained few data in that range.

Simulation of the phenological development of wheat and maize at the global scale

“…Our approach allows accurate derivation of parameters for wheat phenology models, but for maize the approach has more limitations. This could be due to a more complex phenological response to temperature in maize (Kumudini et al ., ), oversimplistic assumptions about the development phase that is sensitive to photoperiod (Birch et al ., ), as well as to overestimation of the effect of photoperiod in tropical regions where the longest and shortest days are not very different (see equation and Table ). These limitations for maize need to be considered when employing our approach, and we suggest that the thermal model is used for maize.…”

Mapping Smallholder Yield Heterogeneity at Multiple Scales in Eastern Africa

“…However, this assumption can often be violated as shown in several maize model intercomparison studies (e.g., [19,20]). Following our experience with tuning APSIM simulations for rainfed maize in the US Midwest [8], we tested multiple modifications throughout the simulation pipeline.…”

Adaptive physiological and biochemical response of sugarcane genotypes to high-temperature stress

“…The degree of climate change impact on sugarcane is associated with geographic location and adaptive capacity. However, there has been little research conducted to document these effects as found by Kumudini et al (2014). Based on pot and field studies with intensive measurements of physiological, growth, and yield traits, we also found that some sugarcane genotypes are more tolerant to stress environment than others (Zhao et al 2015).…”