2012
DOI: 10.1016/s0022-3913(12)60183-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predicting marginal fit of CAD/CAM crowns based on the presence or absence of common preparation errors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
87
1
8

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 91 publications
(98 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
2
87
1
8
Order By: Relevance
“…The mean marginal gap was 38.5 microns with a standard deviation 9 microns for the ideal preparation group, 58.3 microns with a standard deviation 12 microns for the fair preparation group, and 90.1 microns with a standard deviation 23 microns for the poor preparation group. The authors concluded that the category of preparation affected significantly the marginal fit of E.max CAD crowns (p-value<0.001) 17) …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The mean marginal gap was 38.5 microns with a standard deviation 9 microns for the ideal preparation group, 58.3 microns with a standard deviation 12 microns for the fair preparation group, and 90.1 microns with a standard deviation 23 microns for the poor preparation group. The authors concluded that the category of preparation affected significantly the marginal fit of E.max CAD crowns (p-value<0.001) 17) …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Renne and colleagues 17) studied the marginal gap of E.max CAD (E4D scanning unit) crowns in combination with three categories of preparation: Ideal (n=25), fair (n=34), and poor (n=15). The authors considered both heavy chamfer and modified shoulder preparations as acceptable.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Often, a clear differentiation between these potentially counteracting effects is not possible [25,26].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Currently, while the popularity of the CAD/CAM laboratory systems is increasing dramatically, initial CAD/CAM prostheses have been criticized for the poor fit by some authors [6–8]. However, this defect has been improved quickly and many recent studies reported that the fit of the CAD/CAM all-ceramic crowns is similar to that of conventionally fabricated crowns [6, 913].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%