2023
DOI: 10.1007/s10825-023-02056-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predicting model of I–V characteristics of quantum-confined GaAs nanotube: a machine learning and DFT-based combined framework

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1
1
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 27 publications
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For to obtain more accurately band gap for this nanotube we implementing LSDA and Hubbard U semiempirical corrections: U=4.8 eV for p states of carbon and U =5 eV for d states of silicon atom. In this case, from our calculations we obtained the rst-prinsiples calculated direct and indirect band gap values are 5.2 and 3.3 eV for bulk SiC with wurtzite structure and our results very closer with experimental result (E g =3.330) [51]. When we get the accurate band gap for this bulk structure then we continue our investigations for single-walled SiC nanotube (SWSiCNT).…”
Section: Electronic Properties Of Sicnt+vsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…For to obtain more accurately band gap for this nanotube we implementing LSDA and Hubbard U semiempirical corrections: U=4.8 eV for p states of carbon and U =5 eV for d states of silicon atom. In this case, from our calculations we obtained the rst-prinsiples calculated direct and indirect band gap values are 5.2 and 3.3 eV for bulk SiC with wurtzite structure and our results very closer with experimental result (E g =3.330) [51]. When we get the accurate band gap for this bulk structure then we continue our investigations for single-walled SiC nanotube (SWSiCNT).…”
Section: Electronic Properties Of Sicnt+vsupporting
confidence: 81%