Predicting Motor Imagery BCI Performance Based on EEG Microstate Analysis

Abstract

Motor imagery (MI) electroencephalography (EEG) is natural and comfortable for controllers, and has become a research hotspot in the field of the brain–computer interface (BCI). Exploring the inter-subject MI-BCI performance variation is one of the fundamental problems in MI-BCI application. EEG microstates with high spatiotemporal resolution and multichannel information can represent brain cognitive function. In this paper, four EEG microstates (MS1, MS2, MS3, MS4) were used in the analysis of the differences in the subjects’ MI-BCI performance, and the four microstate feature parameters (the mean duration, the occurrences per second, the time coverage ratio, and the transition probability) were calculated. The correlation between the resting-state EEG microstate feature parameters and the subjects’ MI-BCI performance was measured. Based on the negative correlation of the occurrence of MS1 and the positive correlation of the mean duration of MS3, a resting-state microstate predictor was proposed. Twenty-eight subjects were recruited to participate in our MI experiments to assess the performance of our resting-state microstate predictor. The experimental results show that the average area under curve (AUC) value of our resting-state microstate predictor was 0.83, and increased by 17.9% compared with the spectral entropy predictor, representing that the microstate feature parameters can better fit the subjects’ MI-BCI performance than spectral entropy predictor. Moreover, the AUC of microstate predictor is higher than that of spectral entropy predictor at both the single-session level and average level. Overall, our resting-state microstate predictor can help MI-BCI researchers better select subjects, save time, and promote MI-BCI development.

Upper extremity training followed by lower extremity training with a brain-computer interface rehabilitation system

“…This observation suggests that BCI performance is to some extent intrinsic to the patient, even though improvements are possible, as described previously. While there are predictors of MI performance based on resting state EEG such as theta and mu power ( Ahn et al, 2013 ), spectral entropy ( Zhang et al, 2015 ), microstates ( Cui et al, 2023 ) and connectivity ( Lee et al, 2020 ), these analyses are typically specific to healthy individuals necessitating similar studies in stroke patients.…”