2008
DOI: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2008.01190.x
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predicting natural mortality rates of plants and animals

Abstract: Understanding the factors that control the mortality rates of species in their natural environments is important for understanding the structure and dynamics of populations, communities and ecosystems. Here, we test a model of natural mortality that yields explicit, quantitative predictions based on the constraints of body size and temperature on individual metabolism. Extensive field data from plants, invertebrates, fish, birds and mammals indicate that much of the heterogeneity in rates of natural mortality … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

9
170
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 152 publications
(180 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
9
170
1
Order By: Relevance
“…4; 95% CI, 0.27-0.45; r 2 = 0.57, P < 10 −5 ), significantly higher than the predicted value of 0.25. However, the scaling exponents for whole colonies and unitary insects, respectively, were 0.24 (95% CI, 0.14-0.34; r 2 = 0.39, P < 10 −5 ) and 0.24 (95% CI, 0.01-0.47; r 2 = 0.26, P < 4 × 10 −2 ), which are nearly identical to the predicted value and to those observed in other taxonomic groups (21,22,28). Thus, the steeper exponent of 0.36 for the combined data appears to arise from the 4-to 5-fold higher intercept observed for colonies.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 74%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…4; 95% CI, 0.27-0.45; r 2 = 0.57, P < 10 −5 ), significantly higher than the predicted value of 0.25. However, the scaling exponents for whole colonies and unitary insects, respectively, were 0.24 (95% CI, 0.14-0.34; r 2 = 0.39, P < 10 −5 ) and 0.24 (95% CI, 0.01-0.47; r 2 = 0.26, P < 4 × 10 −2 ), which are nearly identical to the predicted value and to those observed in other taxonomic groups (21,22,28). Thus, the steeper exponent of 0.36 for the combined data appears to arise from the 4-to 5-fold higher intercept observed for colonies.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 74%
“…Normalizing the data in this manner, as described in Brown et al (21) and following convention (23,28,31), normalizes for the previously established effects of temperature on metabolism in nonflying species and for the previously established, empirically observed differences in body mass-corrected metabolic rates among taxa. Note that we did not correct the metabolic rates of flying species for temperature as all species considered here had nest temperatures in the range of 30-32°C.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reducing energy expenditure by reducing basal metabolic rate has also been proposed as a way to increase longevity [20,21], body size and longevity being negatively correlated with basal metabolic rate in endotherms even if there are quite significant differences between vertebrate classes ( [12]; see electronic supplementary material). Compared with other vertebrates, salamanders have reduced activity and lower metabolism [22], which might have facilitated their colonization of subterranean habitats.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous metaanalysis indicates that the phytoplankton total mortality rate (including both intrinsic and extrinsic mortality) shows a −1/4 power-law relationship between size-specific mortality and body size (McCoy and Gillooly, 2008). Given that the grazing mortality is independent of body size, we suggest that the −1/4 scaling of total mortality versus body size of phytoplankton is to a large extent determined by the intrinsic processes.…”
Section: Scaling Of Size-specific Growth Rates (µ) and Mortality (M)mentioning
confidence: 91%
“…However, the relationship between extrinsic mortality and body size is not well studied. Interestingly, McCoy and Gillooly (2008) compiled comprehensive empirical data and reported that the total mortality (i.e. the sum of both intrinsic and extrinsic mortality) of organisms also scales with body size with a −1/4 exponent, which suggests that either extrinsic mortality also scales with body size with a −1/4 exponent or extrinsic mortality is independent of body size.…”
Section: F H Chang Et Al: Scaling Of Growth Rate and Mortalitymentioning
confidence: 99%