2001
DOI: 10.1554/0014-3820(2001)055[0859:pngcfm]2.0.co;2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predicting Nuclear Gene Coalescence From Mitochondrial Data: The Three-Times Rule

Abstract: Coalescence theory predicts when genetic drift at nuclear loci will result in fixation of sequence differences to produce monophyletic gene trees. However, the theory is difficult to apply to particular taxa because it hinges on genetically effective population size, which is generally unknown. Neutral theory also predicts that evolution of monophyly will be four times slower in nuclear than in mitochondrial genes primarily because genetic drift is slower at nuclear loci. Variation in mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA)… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

7
125
2
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 274 publications
(135 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
7
125
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Although the use of a single molecular marker such as mtDNA might result in mistaken intraspecific histories (Avise & Wollenberg 1997), mtDNA gene trees routinely recover significant divisions in avian species; rarely have nuclear markers shown that such divisions are incorrect (Avise 2000). Furthermore, because of longer coalescence times, nuclear markers such as microsatellites are unlikely to capture genetic diversity not also evident in mtDNA gene trees (Palumbi et al 2001). However, it will be important to confirm the findings reported here with nuclear loci.…”
Section: (B) Datasetmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…Although the use of a single molecular marker such as mtDNA might result in mistaken intraspecific histories (Avise & Wollenberg 1997), mtDNA gene trees routinely recover significant divisions in avian species; rarely have nuclear markers shown that such divisions are incorrect (Avise 2000). Furthermore, because of longer coalescence times, nuclear markers such as microsatellites are unlikely to capture genetic diversity not also evident in mtDNA gene trees (Palumbi et al 2001). However, it will be important to confirm the findings reported here with nuclear loci.…”
Section: (B) Datasetmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…The ANCOVA analysis of microsatellite data showed a marginally significant effect of latitude on the H E parameter, suggesting that northern migrations have left a weaker signature on the patterns of diversity on the nuclear genome, in contrast to the chloroplast genome. This pattern is probably the consequence of the lower effective population size of cytoplasmic genes in comparison with nuclear genes (Birky, Fuerst, & Maruyama, 1989; Palumbi, Cipriano, & Hare, 2001). …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, gene flow should be higher for nuclear markers carried by pollen than for organellar markers carried by seeds and may explain the detection of more genetically differentiated groups of populations using cpDNA than nuclear markers. Divergent patterns of genetic structure might also be explained by the more rapid coalescence of uniparentally inherited haploid alleles in mitochondrial or chloroplast DNA that have smaller effective population sizes than most nuclear loci (Birky et al., 1989; Palumbi et al., 2001). Smaller effective population size for organellar DNA accelerates the processes of genetic drift in neutral markers, producing more rapid genetic divergence among populations (Palumbi et al., 2001).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…So at migration/drift equilibrium the difference between the two is expected to be relatively minor. Nevertheless, Palumbi et al (2001) showed that, under complete separation, organelles will reach this equilibrium much faster than nuclear markers, whereas stochasticity further blurs the difference (Hudson & Turelli 2003). More complex histories could of course be simulated, but simplicity of the model is an important criterion when selecting among competing hypotheses (Knowles & Maddison 2002).…”
Section: The Fossil Record Provides a Demographic Situationmentioning
confidence: 99%