2007
DOI: 10.1523/jneurosci.1158-07.2007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predicting Odor Pleasantness from Odorant Structure: Pleasantness as a Reflection of the Physical World

Abstract: Although it is agreed that physicochemical features of molecules determine their perceived odor, the rules governing this relationship remain unknown. A significant obstacle to such understanding is the high dimensionality of features describing both percepts and molecules. We applied a statistical method to reduce dimensionality in both odor percepts and physicochemical descriptors for a large set of molecules. We found that the primary axis of perception was odor pleasantness, and critically, that the primar… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

25
303
4
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 344 publications
(333 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
25
303
4
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Participants evaluated, on a visual analogue scale presented on the screen, the pleasantness (from ''extremely unpleasant'' to ''extremely pleasant''), familiarity (from ''not familiar at all'' to ''extremely familiar''), edibility (from ''not edible'' to ''extremely edible''), and intensity (from ''not perceived'' to ''extremely strong'') of the chocolate odor and of the odorless air (e.g., Delplanque et al, 2008;Khan et al, 2007). Subsequently, they answered questions about chocolate (back translated to French from Rolls & McCabe, 2007) that allowed investigation of whether participants associated chocolate with the two components of reward (Berridge & Robinson, 2003): motivation (i.e., ''On a scale from 1 to 10, how much would you say that you sometimes crave chocolate?'')…”
Section: Manipulation Checkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Participants evaluated, on a visual analogue scale presented on the screen, the pleasantness (from ''extremely unpleasant'' to ''extremely pleasant''), familiarity (from ''not familiar at all'' to ''extremely familiar''), edibility (from ''not edible'' to ''extremely edible''), and intensity (from ''not perceived'' to ''extremely strong'') of the chocolate odor and of the odorless air (e.g., Delplanque et al, 2008;Khan et al, 2007). Subsequently, they answered questions about chocolate (back translated to French from Rolls & McCabe, 2007) that allowed investigation of whether participants associated chocolate with the two components of reward (Berridge & Robinson, 2003): motivation (i.e., ''On a scale from 1 to 10, how much would you say that you sometimes crave chocolate?'')…”
Section: Manipulation Checkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We obtained 86 monomolecular odorants that were well distributed in both perceptual (Fig. 1A) (1,(11)(12)(13) and physicochemical ( Fig. 1B) (1, 14, 15) stimulus space.…”
Section: Mixtures With Many Equal-intensity Spanned Components Begin Tomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Each target mixture (1,4,10,15,20,30,40, or 43 components) was compared with all other mixtures (1,4,10,15,20,30,40, or 43 components) and, as a control, with itself. Other than comparisons of a mixture with itself, all comparisons were nonoverlapping; in other words, each pair of mixtures being compared had no components in common.…”
Section: Mixtures With Many Equal-intensity Spanned Components Begin Tomentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations