2023
DOI: 10.1044/2022_jslhr-22-00347
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predicting Outcomes of Language Rehabilitation: Prognostic Factors for Immediate and Long-Term Outcomes After Aphasia Therapy

Abstract: Background: Aphasia therapy is an effective approach to improve language function in chronic aphasia. However, it remains unclear what prognostic factors facilitate therapy response at the individual level. Here, we utilized data from the POLAR (Predicting Outcomes of Language Rehabilitation in Aphasia) trial to (a) determine therapy-induced change in confrontation naming and long-term maintenance of naming gains and (b) examine the extent to which aphasia severity, age, education, time postonset, … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 109 publications
2
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These results should be interpreted with caution because the length of the follow-up period varied substantially and we do not have any detailed information about SLT intensity or extra access to community-based aphasia programs during that time. Still, these data indicate the long-term stability of treatment effects in a real-world setting, similar to the 6-month follow-up data of previous studies [11,28]. Assuming a less intensive treatment period between post-treatment and follow-up assessment, the percentage of even more improvements at the individual level was surprisingly high (63%).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These results should be interpreted with caution because the length of the follow-up period varied substantially and we do not have any detailed information about SLT intensity or extra access to community-based aphasia programs during that time. Still, these data indicate the long-term stability of treatment effects in a real-world setting, similar to the 6-month follow-up data of previous studies [11,28]. Assuming a less intensive treatment period between post-treatment and follow-up assessment, the percentage of even more improvements at the individual level was surprisingly high (63%).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…In our dataset, we had more than 10% missing data on handedness and education. Correlation analyses did not indicate any significant relationships with therapy outcome (see Supplementary Table 5), in accordance with previous literature [11,27,28]. Consequently, handedness and education were removed from further statistical analyses.…”
Section: Missing Data and Outlierssupporting
confidence: 75%
“…for detailed protocol). 25 Language testing included the Western Aphasia Battery (WAB), from which an overall aphasia severity score [Aphasia Quotient (WAB AQ)] was calculated for each participant. Behavioural tests were administered on a laptop (MacBook Pro) or an iPad by ASHA-certified speech and language pathologists with experience working with individuals with aphasia.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Behavioral and imaging data from participants (N = 70) with chronic language impairment (aphasia) after left-hemisphere stroke were retrospectively analyzed. All participants were part of the Predicting Outcomes of Language Rehabilitation (POLAR; NCT03416738) study at the Center for the Study of Aphasia Recovery (C-STAR) at the University of South Carolina and the Medical University of South Carolina (Kristinsson et al, 2021(Kristinsson et al, , 2023. ASHAcertified speech-language pathologists with experience working with individuals with aphasia administered all assessments.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%