1972
DOI: 10.5703/1288284313839
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predicting Park 'N Ride Parking Demand : Technical Paper

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This work follows the line of research on capacity sizing for park‐and‐ride lots. Early studies, such as Abdus‐Samad and Grecco (1972) and Spillar (1997), were mostly performed in collaboration with local DOTs and focused on developing site‐level demand models , in which regression analysis is applied to forecast the demand at an individual park‐and‐ride lot based on characteristics such as the location and accessibility. These studies treat demand forecasting and capacity sizing as two separate decision‐making processes: Demand is estimated first and a capacity size is then chosen to serve the anticipated demand.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This work follows the line of research on capacity sizing for park‐and‐ride lots. Early studies, such as Abdus‐Samad and Grecco (1972) and Spillar (1997), were mostly performed in collaboration with local DOTs and focused on developing site‐level demand models , in which regression analysis is applied to forecast the demand at an individual park‐and‐ride lot based on characteristics such as the location and accessibility. These studies treat demand forecasting and capacity sizing as two separate decision‐making processes: Demand is estimated first and a capacity size is then chosen to serve the anticipated demand.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Meanwhile, the utility is formulated to depend on the demand and (average) parking utilization to account for the effects of congestion and parking information on commuter choice. The commuter choice model developed in this work can be viewed as an extended version of the site‐level demand model, which has been applied to forecast the demands for individual park‐and‐ride lots (Abdus‐Samad & Grecco, 1972; Bullard & Christiansen, 1983; Niles & Pogodzinski, 2021; Spillar, 1997). Using the MNL‐based commuter choice model, we represent the demands at all lots at equilibrium (given a capacity sizing decision) as a solution to a (vector) fixed‐point equation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%