2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.parkreldis.2022.01.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predicting Parkinson's disease using gradient boosting decision tree models with electroencephalography signals

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
23
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
1
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There are currently few studies using the Iowa dataset (14 PD patients and 14 controls), for which our proposed MCNN model has a large improvement in classification performance compared to other related studies ( Anjum et al, 2020 ; Lee et al, 2022 ). E.g., our accuracy is about 14.12% higher than the linear-predictive-coding EEG algorithm proposed by Anjum et al (2020) , and about 10.52% higher than the Hjorth parameter and the gradient boosting decision tree algorithm proposed by Lee et al (2022) .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…There are currently few studies using the Iowa dataset (14 PD patients and 14 controls), for which our proposed MCNN model has a large improvement in classification performance compared to other related studies ( Anjum et al, 2020 ; Lee et al, 2022 ). E.g., our accuracy is about 14.12% higher than the linear-predictive-coding EEG algorithm proposed by Anjum et al (2020) , and about 10.52% higher than the Hjorth parameter and the gradient boosting decision tree algorithm proposed by Lee et al (2022) .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…There are currently few studies using the Iowa dataset (14 PD patients and 14 controls), for which our proposed MCNN model has a large improvement in classification performance compared to other related studies ( Anjum et al, 2020 ; Lee et al, 2022 ). E.g., our accuracy is about 14.12% higher than the linear-predictive-coding EEG algorithm proposed by Anjum et al (2020) , and about 10.52% higher than the Hjorth parameter and the gradient boosting decision tree algorithm proposed by Lee et al (2022) . For the UC San Diego dataset (15 PD patients and 16 controls), the classification performance (accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and AUC are above 93% in γ band) of our proposed MCNN model is comparable, although not the highest, compared to other related studies ( Khare et al, 2021a , b ; Loh et al, 2021 ; Shaban, 2021 ; Shaban and Amara, 2022 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We also compare the machine learning methods. As shown in Table 2 , the classification accuracy of XGBoost [ 46 ] is 79.58%, the classification accuracy of graded CatBoost [ 47 ] is 94.14%, the classification accuracy of random forest (RF) [ 48 ] is 87.98%, and the classification accuracy of the support vector machine (SVM) [ 24 ] is 95.63%. The classification accuracy of the K-nearest neighbor (KNN) algorithm [ 27 ] is 94.23%.…”
Section: Experimental Results and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, it forms a basis for diagnosing stroke in the elderly ( Choi et al, 2021 ), intending to reduce neural damage through timely intervention, or alleviating the financial burden of patients compared with other neuroimaging techniques such as computed tomography. Furthermore, a wide range of medical applications have been flourishing along with advances in technology, enabling medical professionals to utilize EEG for intelligent diagnosis of various neurological and neuropsychiatric disorders such as depression ( Jiang et al, 2021 ), epilepsy ( Subasi et al, 2017 ; Amin et al, 2020 ) and Parkinson’s disease (PD) ( Lee et al, 2022 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%