2015
DOI: 10.1080/00981389.2015.1054059
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predicting Patient Advocacy Engagement: A Multiple Regression Analysis Using Data From Health Professionals in Acute-Care Hospitals

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The authors’ finding that survivors endorsed self-advocacy as a way to manage their treatment reflects national trends of cancer survivors’ desires to be involved throughout their cancer care experience (Chewning et al, 2012; Say, Murtagh, & Thomson, 2006). Although providers in the current study reported overall positive views of survivor self-advocacy, research has demonstrated that nurses, social workers, and other clinicians frequently report barriers to advocating for survivors, including lack of professional skill, not being eager to engage in advocacy, and lack of institutional support (Jansson, Nyamathi, Heidemann, Duan, & Kaplan, 2015; Vaartio-Rajalin & Leino-Kilpi, 2011). These barriers are analogous to those reflected in the current study, including concerns about the ability to answer questions and develop treatment plans, both of which require refined skill and dedicated effort on the part of providers.…”
Section: Implications For Nursingmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…The authors’ finding that survivors endorsed self-advocacy as a way to manage their treatment reflects national trends of cancer survivors’ desires to be involved throughout their cancer care experience (Chewning et al, 2012; Say, Murtagh, & Thomson, 2006). Although providers in the current study reported overall positive views of survivor self-advocacy, research has demonstrated that nurses, social workers, and other clinicians frequently report barriers to advocating for survivors, including lack of professional skill, not being eager to engage in advocacy, and lack of institutional support (Jansson, Nyamathi, Heidemann, Duan, & Kaplan, 2015; Vaartio-Rajalin & Leino-Kilpi, 2011). These barriers are analogous to those reflected in the current study, including concerns about the ability to answer questions and develop treatment plans, both of which require refined skill and dedicated effort on the part of providers.…”
Section: Implications For Nursingmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…For patients, the consequence is that improving patient safety 33,56 and quality of care, 57 development of a sense of self-determining 3 and empowering, 58 improving collaboration among patients, families, and the healthcare team, 9 improving access to health and social services, 44 and improving the public health. 59,60 For nurses, the consequences of patient advocacy could be positive and negative. The positive consequences for nurses are experiencing a sense of being worthwhile, 22 improving self-concept, 7 job motivation, 9 job satisfaction, 22 and enhancement of the public image of nursing.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4 In this approach, human behavior is guided by their behavioral beliefs and, as a result, the sum of efforts and collective perceptions strengthens the engagement in political advocacy, besides making health professionals more prone to political advocacy if they perceive it as effective to improve the population's health. 5 Committing to the defense of health-related rights and seeking to transform dysfunctional policies that increase the well-being of users is a moral duty of those who provide care and are committed to their work in the eld of health.1 As members of the multiprofessional health team, nurses should perceive the importance of defending users in situations of avoidable harm, a fact that encourages them to leave the comfort zone and enter the political sphere, with the objective that their actions impact public policies, while also providing real examples to contribute to the defense of users' rights and interests.6…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%