Predicting Patterns of Problematic Smartphone Use among University Students: A Latent Class Analysis

Abstract

University students are consistently ranked among the highest users of smartphones. As such, recent research has focused on examining the antecedents and consequences of problematic smartphone use among university students. While this work has been instrumental to our understanding of the risk and protective factors of developing problematic smartphone use, it has been largely variable-centered and thus fails to recognize the diversity with which problematic smartphone use is experienced among university students. As such, this study employed a person-centered approach (i.e., latent class analysis) to classify individuals based on patterns of problematic smartphone use feature/symptom cooccurrence among a sample of 403 Canadian university students. The relationships between these subgroups (or classes) and potential covariates (i.e., self-regulation, attachment anxiety, and attachment avoidance) were then examined to gain a more complete understanding of university students’ experiences of problematic smartphone use. Three classes of problematic smartphone use were identified: (1) “connected” displaying the features/symptoms of problematic smartphone use associated with being constantly connected to smartphones; (2) “problematic” displaying all of the features/symptoms of problematic smartphone use; (3) “distracted” displaying the features/symptoms associated with being distracted by smartphones. Findings indicate that attachment anxiety and avoidance were significantly associated with membership in the most pathological (i.e., “problematic”) class, suggesting that this may be an especially important risk factor for developing problematic smartphone use among university students. Moreover, self-regulation was significantly related to membership in the least pathological class (i.e., “connected”) suggesting that this may function as an important protective factor in developing more concerning patterns of problematic smartphone use. Findings from this work provide empirical evidence of a heterogeneity in patterns of problematic smartphone use associated with distinct individual-level risk factors. This has important implications for conceptualizations of problematic smartphone use and the development of intervention and prevention efforts.

What makes children aged 10 to 13 engage in problematic smartphone use? A longitudinal study of changing patterns considering individual, parental, and school factors

“…As a result of the study, three PSU change trajectory types were identified: a high-level group (7.7%), a mid-increasing group (62.5%), and a low-increasing group (29.8%). The finding is compatible with those of Parent et al. (2022) , whom identified three latent groups of PSU, this is a similar result, but at the same time, it is a new result that was not confirmed in previous studies.…”

“…(2022) , whom identified three latent groups of PSU, this is a similar result, but at the same time, it is a new result that was not confirmed in previous studies. In the study by Parent et al. (2022) , three latent classes were identified: the ‘connected class,' the ‘problematic class,' and the ‘distracted class.'…”

“…However, these studies have the limitation of assuming that the population is ‘one' and missing the fact that there may be various sub-potential groups. Parent, Bond, Wu, and Shapka (2022) overcame the limitation of assuming only one population and performed a latent class analysis to identify various potential groups. However, although this study is meaningful in that it identified various potential groups, it has limitations in that it failed to consider changes over time by analyzing only one point in time.…”

Distinct patterns of problematic smartphone use and related factors in Chinese college students

“…To avoid solutions based on local maxima, we used 200 random sets of starting values initially and 50 final stage optimizations. Additionally, each latent class was defined with meaningful clinical interpretability [51]. Posterior probabilities from the model were used to assign each participant to their most likely class [18].…”

Human addictive behavior prediction by using lime with ensemble model

“…The addiction is transformed from one person's physiological characteristics and addictive behavior is compulsive behavior. It begins as a pleasurable activity that progresses to serious demand and compulsive conduct [12]- [14]. The main goal was to show a framework that allowed an individual to input the lifestyle activities as input [15]- [17].…”