2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2009.11.022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predicting pork water-holding capacity with NIR spectroscopy in relation to different reference methods

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
25
0
3

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
1
25
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The former has been used for the rapid detection of total viable counts in pork (Barbin, Sun, & Su, 2013;Huang, Zhao, Chen, & Zhang, 2013) and of the water-holding capacity of fresh beef (ElMasry, Sun, & Allen, 2011) and pork (Prevolnik, Čandek-Potokar, & Škorjanc, 2010). Meanwhile, multispectral image analysis has high potency for the evaluation of food quality systems during handling, processing and storage (Løkke et al, 2013), and it has been previously used for the conversion of meat color in L*, a*, b* values (Sharifzadeh, Clemmensen, Borggaard, Støier, & Ersbøll, 2014) and for quality assessment of beef (Dissing et al, 2013;Panagou, Papadopoulou, Carstensen, & Nychas, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The former has been used for the rapid detection of total viable counts in pork (Barbin, Sun, & Su, 2013;Huang, Zhao, Chen, & Zhang, 2013) and of the water-holding capacity of fresh beef (ElMasry, Sun, & Allen, 2011) and pork (Prevolnik, Čandek-Potokar, & Škorjanc, 2010). Meanwhile, multispectral image analysis has high potency for the evaluation of food quality systems during handling, processing and storage (Løkke et al, 2013), and it has been previously used for the conversion of meat color in L*, a*, b* values (Sharifzadeh, Clemmensen, Borggaard, Støier, & Ersbøll, 2014) and for quality assessment of beef (Dissing et al, 2013;Panagou, Papadopoulou, Carstensen, & Nychas, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Leroy et al [9] reported the R 2 cv range of 0.25 to 0.47 for beef CL prediction using NIR spectroscopy, while an R 2 value of 0.001 for young cattle meat and 0.138 for oxen meat was obtained in Prieto et al [11]. Prevolnik et al [12] reported unsuccessful prediction of pork CL with NIR spectroscopy by showing the R p 2 of 0.26-0.39, and in the study of Liu et al [10], an R 2 value of 0.49 for chicken meat CL was obtained. Despite the meat species and discrepancies in experimental designs, the performance in our study was better than in the published studies using NIR spectroscopy.…”
Section: Spectral Featuresmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Therefore, in this work, the established PLS-DA model based on full spectra was selected for further evaluation. In the literature there are few reports concerning the qualitative or quantitative prediction of meat CL using the spectroscopic method [9][10][11][12]. Leroy et al [9] reported the R 2 cv range of 0.25 to 0.47 for beef CL prediction using NIR spectroscopy, while an R 2 value of 0.001 for young cattle meat and 0.138 for oxen meat was obtained in Prieto et al [11].…”
Section: Spectral Featuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Besides water content, another attribute of concern for consumers purchasing meat, is water holding capacity (WHC). WHC (indicated as drip loss) is an important meat quality indicator because decrease in WHC correlates with reduced processing quality (Prevolnik et al, 2010). In the recent years scientists have also applied HSI techniques in pork, beef, and lamb for determining WHC (ElMasry et al, 2011b;Barbin et al, 2012b;Kamruzzaman et al, 2012a).…”
Section: Prediction Of Water Content and Water Holding Capacity (Whc)mentioning
confidence: 99%