2017
DOI: 10.4996/fireecology.130290243
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predicting Post-Fire Tree Mortality for 12 Western US Conifers Using the First Order Fire Effects Model (FOFEM)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
31
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
1
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We do not presume that the variables used in this study represent all of the potential influences on individual post‐fire tree mortality. Factors affecting post‐fire conditions (e.g., post‐fire climate, bark beetle attack) may be useful for specifically describing tree mortality but not predicting fire effects (Hood and Lutes ). For example, nearly all of our trees that were dead at the time of our field observations showed symptoms of bark beetle activity, although we cannot be certain if these symptoms were present when trees were originally determined to be dead.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We do not presume that the variables used in this study represent all of the potential influences on individual post‐fire tree mortality. Factors affecting post‐fire conditions (e.g., post‐fire climate, bark beetle attack) may be useful for specifically describing tree mortality but not predicting fire effects (Hood and Lutes ). For example, nearly all of our trees that were dead at the time of our field observations showed symptoms of bark beetle activity, although we cannot be certain if these symptoms were present when trees were originally determined to be dead.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…). The relatively few accuracy assessments of empirical model predictions have been mostly favorable, but additional variables can increase model accuracy (e.g., cambial kill, bark beetle attack; Hood and Lutes ). As with any empirical model, the accuracy of post‐fire tree mortality models are likely to suffer when circumstances depart from conditions under which the models were developed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(Parker et al 2006, Kane et al 2017b. Several post-fire mortality models include beetle attacks(Woolley et al 2012, Hood andLutes 2017). Because bark beetles require living trees with healthy phloem to reproduce, trees killed immediately by fire are not suitable hosts.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bark thickness appears to be a good predictor of first-order mortality, but the assumed linear relationship between bark thickness and tree diameter is not always correct [55]. Zeibig-Kichas [57] found FVS-FFE tended to under-predict bark thickness in California conifers, which would lead to over-prediction of mortality [1,56], but empirical evidence for this effect is lacking given limited data on bark thickness.…”
Section: The Role Of Ra Equation and Tree Species Effectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Accurate predictions of tree mortality in forests affected by fire are important to land managers and policy-makers charged with planning fuel treatments and assessing risk to life and property if wildfire occurs [1,2]. Estimates of the likelihood of trees dying during, or following, a wildfire can influence decisions about when and how to implement mechanical thinning or other fuel reduction treatments.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%