2020
DOI: 10.1007/s40122-020-00196-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predicting Postherpetic Neuralgia in Patients with Herpes Zoster by Machine Learning: A Retrospective Study

Abstract: Introduction: Postherpetic neuralgia (PHN) is a neuropathic pain secondary to shingles. Studies have shown that early pain intervention can reduce the incidence or intensity of PHN. The aim of this study was to predict whether a patient with acute herpetic neuralgia will develop PHN and to help clinicians make better decisions. Method: Five hundred two patients with shingles were reviewed and classified according to whether they had PHN. The risk factors associated with PHN were determined by univariate analys… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The literature exclusion criteria were as follows: (I) data had significant errors, errors, or low reliability; (II) improper use of literature research statistics; (III) documents were repeatedly published or only used for academic meetings and exchanges; (IV) the main content of the literature deviated from the research direction of this paper; (V) the literature did not contain the relevant elements of this study. A total of 14 studies were included in this meta-analysis (1,5,(7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18).…”
Section: Literature Screeningmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The literature exclusion criteria were as follows: (I) data had significant errors, errors, or low reliability; (II) improper use of literature research statistics; (III) documents were repeatedly published or only used for academic meetings and exchanges; (IV) the main content of the literature deviated from the research direction of this paper; (V) the literature did not contain the relevant elements of this study. A total of 14 studies were included in this meta-analysis (1,5,(7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18).…”
Section: Literature Screeningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Postherpetic neuralgia (PHN) is a common sequela of herpes zoster (1,2). PHN lacks a unified definition, mainly referring to the recurrence of pain symptoms after the local rash subsides or skin lesions heal.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For patients with herpes zoster, the area of rash is an independent factor affecting the occurrence of postherpetic neuralgia. [31][32][33] The smaller the lesion area is, the less likely it is to develop postherpetic neuralgia. For patients with limb herpes zoster, the number of affected centrums ≤ 3 is also a protective factor for motor dysfunction in patients with limb herpes zoster.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For ease of calculation, we conducted the following data preprocessing: In terms of sex, we marked “1” for female and “2” for male. The guide methods of the procedure include ultrasound recorded as “1,” CT + ultrasound recorded as “2,” radiography + ultrasound recorded as “3,” CT recorded as “4,” and radiography recorded as “5.” As for education level, we recorded illiteracy as “1,” elementary school level as “2,” junior high school as “3,” senior high school as “4,” and university and above as “5.” We divided different stages of HZ into three layers, which were represented by consecutive numbers: ≤ 1 month was recorded as “1,” between 1 and 3 months was recorded as “2,” and > 3 months was recorded as “3.” As for rash site, we recorded the cervical segment as “1,” head segments as “2,” lumbosacral segments as “3,” and thoracic segment as “4.” For the remaining features, we denoted “no” as “0” and “yes” as “1.” To describe effectiveness of the PRF treatment, we marked the negative as “0” and the positive as “1” according to general practices [ 7 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the remaining features, we denoted ''no'' as ''0'' and ''yes'' as ''1.'' To describe effectiveness of the PRF treatment, we marked the negative as ''0'' and the positive as ''1'' according to general practices [7].…”
Section: Data Processingmentioning
confidence: 99%