2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2017.12.031
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predicting postoperative language outcome using presurgical fMRI, MEG, TMS, and high gamma ECoG

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
17
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 79 publications
1
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, several studies have reported that surgical decision making based on cortical stimulation mapping can lead to postoperative language deficits in patients undergoing epilepsy surgery. 4,6 17 We, along with others, 11,17 found postoperative language deficits after cortical resections that spared cortical stimulation mapping–positive language sites but included electrocorticography-positive language sites. 4 Furthermore, high-gamma electrocorticography has advantages over noninvasive methods, including insensitivity to patients’ head movement and potentially higher accuracy.…”
mentioning
confidence: 55%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In addition, several studies have reported that surgical decision making based on cortical stimulation mapping can lead to postoperative language deficits in patients undergoing epilepsy surgery. 4,6 17 We, along with others, 11,17 found postoperative language deficits after cortical resections that spared cortical stimulation mapping–positive language sites but included electrocorticography-positive language sites. 4 Furthermore, high-gamma electrocorticography has advantages over noninvasive methods, including insensitivity to patients’ head movement and potentially higher accuracy.…”
mentioning
confidence: 55%
“…To address a strong concern about postoperative language deficit after resection of the tuber within the left inferior frontal gyrus (and possible Broca area), we performed presurgical language mapping using functional MRI, magnetoencephalography, and transcranial magnetic stimulation, as part of routine clinical procedures in our center. 4 Patient underwent magnetoencephalography scan under sedation for language mapping using a passive word listening task. Magnetoencephalography was not successful in localizing language-specific cortex.…”
Section: Presurgical Language Mapping Using Noninvasive Modalitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Hirata et al (42) reported distances between MEG activation maxima and DCS positive sites of 6.0 ± 7.1 mm, Simos et al (34) described concordant results in a case report. Babajani-Feremi et al (55) showed that the combination of fMRI, high-gamma electrocorticography (ECoG) and MEG predicted postoperative language decline best, while integrating fMRI and MEG provided the best trade-off between model complexity and prediction accuracy. Tarapore et al (56) compared TMS, DCS, and MEG for language mapping in the same patients and found high sensitivity and specificity (90 and 98%) of TMS for DCS results in a population of 12 patients with lesions around cortical language areas, while MEG results correlated with TMS sites only in 5 subjects and DCS sites in 2 subjects.…”
Section: Eeg/meg Functional Cortical Mapping Compared To Other Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A recent machine learning study used a support vector regression (SVR) model and the results of multimodal presurgical language mapping, including fMRI, MEG, transcranial magnetic stimulation, and high-gamma ECoG (hgECoG), to predict postoperative language outcome. The SVR model consisting of fMRI and MEG was the optimal model that facilitated the best trade-off between model complexity and prediction accuracy 133 .…”
Section: Functional Magnetic Resonance Imagingmentioning
confidence: 99%