2020
DOI: 10.1159/000497490
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predicting Progression of Untreated Macular Pucker Using Retinal Surface En Face Optical Coherence Tomography

Abstract: To review visual outcomes in untreated premacular membrane (PMM) with macular pucker (MP) and evaluate novel predictors of progression. Methods: In this retrospective observation study, we included 342 eyes with untreated PMM with MP between 2012 and 2015. PMMs were characterized by spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) imaging based on foveal morphologies, number of retinal contraction centers, central subfield thickness (CST), inner segment ellipsoid band integrity, and photoreceptor deformat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 39 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“… 10 The pathogenic mechanism is often and improperly simplified as a “contraction” of the “retinal surface” and the coronal (often and somehow improperly defined as “tangential” in clinical speech) component is regarded as the predominant feature, while ERMs indeed affect the entire retinal structure, and displacement occurs along all three axes as shown by en face 11 (coronal) and sagittal OCT imaging. 12 Artificial intelligence algorithms also found alterations in the inner perifoveal retina to be better predictors of visual impairment 13 than surface indicators, and Li et al 14 found the amount of retinal surface undergoing thickening as the only significant predictor of visual impairment before surgery. A recent meta-analysis, however, found the integrity of EZ, interdigitation zones, and photoreceptor outer segment length as predictors of better visual outcomes after surgery.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 10 The pathogenic mechanism is often and improperly simplified as a “contraction” of the “retinal surface” and the coronal (often and somehow improperly defined as “tangential” in clinical speech) component is regarded as the predominant feature, while ERMs indeed affect the entire retinal structure, and displacement occurs along all three axes as shown by en face 11 (coronal) and sagittal OCT imaging. 12 Artificial intelligence algorithms also found alterations in the inner perifoveal retina to be better predictors of visual impairment 13 than surface indicators, and Li et al 14 found the amount of retinal surface undergoing thickening as the only significant predictor of visual impairment before surgery. A recent meta-analysis, however, found the integrity of EZ, interdigitation zones, and photoreceptor outer segment length as predictors of better visual outcomes after surgery.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%